Information - Judgment Search Results
Informant Vs. State Of Karnataka By
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-11-2023
learned Counsel for the parties.3. On 18.05.2022, the victim girl aged about 21 years had submitted a written information, based on which FIR in Crime No.120/2022 was registered by Maddur Police Station, Mandya District, against respondent no.2
Public Information Officer vs the State Information Commission
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-11-2024
THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.8.2023 IN WP(C) NO.15163 OF 2013 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER: PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, OFFICE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680001. BY ADV. SRI. P.C.SASIDHARAN KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN -
Public Information Officer vs the State Information Commission
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-11-2024
THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.8.2023 IN WP(C) NO.15163 OF 2013 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER: PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, OFFICE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680001. BY ADV. SRI. P.C.SASIDHARAN KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN -
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Public Information Officer and Secretary, Shrimad Raghavendra Co-o ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-25-2009
Reported in: 2009(6)KarLJ299
By the impugned order vide Annexure-D, dated 25-9-2007, the respondent 1 has directed the petitioner to provide certain information.3. Petitioner is a Co-operative Society. As has been held by this Court in number of judgments, including the
The Public Information Officer/Joint Secretary to Chief Commissioner o ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-04-2008
Reported in: AIR2009AP73; 2009(1)ALT700
that he/she is not a legal heir of Muntakhab holder is justified under the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act, for short)? This interesting question of considerable significance falls for consideration in this writ
Public Information Officer, Chief Minister's Office, Civil Secretariat ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-01-2008
Reported in: 2008(4)AWC3574
Pradeep Kant, J.1. Following two questions arise for determination In the present writ petition:(1) Whether the information disclosing the names of the persons including address and amount, who have received more than Rs. 1 lac
Public Information Officer and anr. Vs. Orissa Information Commission ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jul-22-2009
Reported in: 109(2010)CLT105
Writ Petition has been filed against the impugned Order Dated 10th of January, 2008 passed by the Orissa Information Commission, Bhubaneswar in Complaint Case No. 138 of 2006. By the said order, the State Information Commission imposed
Public Information Officer,uty.of Calicu Vs. Sate Information Commissi ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
DAY OF JULY 2013 13TH ASHADHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 11547 of 2008 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS : ----------- 1. PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM MALAPPURAM (REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT).2. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,
The Central Public Information Officer, Central Bureau of Investigatio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~5 * + W.P.(C) 11092/2017 & CM Nos.45346/2017, 45348/2017 & 2610/2018 THE CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Rahul Sharma and Mr C. K. Bhatt,
The Bidar District Central Co-op Bank Limited Represented by Its Manag ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-03-2008
Reported in: ILR2008KAR3830; 2009(1)KarLJ231:2009(1)AIRKarR481
as under:The respondent No. 2 filed a complaint dated 26.4.2006 (Annexure-A) under Section 18(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (in short, 'the Act') before the Karnataka Information Commission/respondent No. 1 seeking information regarding:(a) the names
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free