Industrialized - Judgment Search Results
Orissa Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bharati Industrie ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-08-2005
Reported in: AIR2006SC198; I(2006)BC362(SC); JT2005(10)SC19; 2005(9)SCALE128; (2005)12SCC725
a writ petition - Appeal was accordingly allowed and judgment of High Court was set aside - MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT (3 OF 1962)Order 39, Rules 1 & 2: [Altamas Kabir & Dr. B.S. Chauhan, JJ] Challenge
Tata Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-09-2008
Reported in: AIR2008SC2970; 2008(3)ARBLR1(SC); 2008BusLR683(SC); (2008)4CompLJ220(SC); JT2008(7)SC575; (2008)7MLJ734(SC); 2008(9)SCALE717; (2008)10SCC187; 2008(2)LC825(SC); 2008AIRSCW5015; 2008(4)CivilLJ91
V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Two companies, first being M/s. Tata Industries Ltd., and the second being M/s. Apex Investments (Mauritius) Holding Private Limited (hereinafter referred to Applicant Nos. 1
Hansa Industries Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Kidarsons Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-13-2006
Reported in: AIR2007SC18; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN78; [2006]134CompCas1(SC); JT2006(9)SC100; 2006(10)SCALE170; (2006)8SCC531; [2006]72SCL117(SC)
case. The relevant facts are really not in dispute. The Respondent No. 1 - Company, namely - Kidarsons Industries Pvt. Ltd. is a Private Limited Company closely held by the Nanda family. Except for a few shares
18-section briefs on any result in this list
industrial Paper (Assam) Ltd. Emps. Union Vs. Management Assam Industr ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-10-2007
Reported in: AIR2007SC985; JT2007(2)SC243; (2007)2LLJ549SC; 2007(2)SCALE328; (2007)3SCC73; 2007(3)SLJ20(SC); 2007AIRSCW752;
by learned Single Judge wherein the writ petition filed by the respondent No. 2 i.e. Management of Assam Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (in short the 'AIDC') was allowed while dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant.
The Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Gra ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-14-1999
Reported in: AIR1999SC1975; 1999(5)ALT18(SC); [1999]97CompCas117(SC); (1999)3CompLJ163(SC); 1999(2)CTC460; JT1999(3)SC619; (1999)3MLJ98(SC); (1999)123PLR190; 1999(3)SCALE674; (1999)4SCC
brief, facts of the case in the civil appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 8208 - The Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd. (ICICI) v. Grapco Industries Ltd. and Anr. ICICI filed an application
VST Industries Ltd. Vs. VST Industries Workers' Union and Anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-07-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALT54(SC); [2001(88)FLR548]; JT2001(1)SC36; 2000(8)SCALE95; (2001)1UPLBEC265
its inception, that is, since 1967; that from 1976 onwards, after expiry of the con tract with the Industrial Catering Services, they had been directly working with the appellant without any contractor; that they sought for regularization
Gupta Steel Industries Vs. Jolly Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-23-1996
Reported in: 1996VIIIAD(SC)60; JT1996(9)SC643; RLW1997(1)SC31; 1996(7)SCALE709; (1996)11SCC678; [1996]Supp6SCR669
Bench on 12.4.1991. Clause (2) of the Compromise Decree reads as under:2.(a) The parties agree that Jolly Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Jolly Torsteel Pvt. Ltd., the respondents herein and the Original plaintiffs in Suit No. 446
Needle Industries (India) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Needle Industries Newey (I ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-07-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1298; (1982)1CompLJ1(SC); 1981(2)SCALE959; (1981)3SCC333; [1981]3SCR698
Company Petition No. 39 of 1977. The main contending parties in these appeals are : (i) the Needle Industries (India) Limited and (ii) the Needle Industries-Newey (Indian Holdings) Limited. These two companies have often been referred to
Rohtas Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Rohtas Industries Staff Union and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-18-1975
Reported in: AIR1976SC425; [1976(32)FLR50]; (1976)ILLJ274SC; (1976)2SCC82; [1976]3SCR12
of these two appeals, before proceeding to state the facts, set out the submissions and decide the points.2. Industrial law in India has not fully lived up to the current challenges of industrial life, both in the
Triveni Engineering & Industries Limited vs.nahar Industrial Enterpris ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2017
AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 2, 2017 Date of Decision: February 20, 2017 + TRIVENI ENGINEERING & INDUSTRIES LIMITED ........ Petitioner O.M.P. 610/2008 Through: Mr. Sanjeev Anand & Mr. Akshay Kapoor, Advocates. versus NAHAR INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free