Skip to content


Industrial Relations - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: industrial relations Page 1 of about 21 results (0.046 seconds)
Feb 21 2006 (HC)

The Manager, Public and Industrial Relations Nuclear Power Corporation ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2006(110)FLR998]; (2006)2MLJ188

by the Central Government which is also called as the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders Central Rules 1946, (hereinafter called as the the relief of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records relating to I.D. No. 1/2000, dated 22.11.2000 on the file of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 2005 (HC)

industrial Relations Manager, Madurai Coats Limited and ors. Vs. Jayar ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2005(2)CTC211; (2005)IILLJ617Mad; (2005)4MLJ284

Sivalingam, 2003 (2) LLJ 231.4. Section 2A where certain specific industrial disputes are enumerated is really an extension of the definition the suit on a preliminary issue, only if the issue relate to jurisdiction of the Court or a bar of suit.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 24 1926 (FN)

Booth Fisheries Co. Vs. Industrial Relations Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

the judicial review of the findings of fact of the Industrial Commission to cases in which "the findings of fact by Booth Fisheries Co. v. Industrial Relations Comm'n - 271 U.S. 208 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court Booth

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 05 2009 (SC)

indo Count Choongnam, Employees Union and anr. Vs. Registrar (Bombay I ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2009(8)SC293; (2009)IVLLJ27SC; 2009(8)SCALE812; (2009)7SCC348:2009AIRSCW5504

whether in an appeal under Section 20 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (hereinafter for short 'the Act') while canceling in an appeal under Section 20 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (hereinafter for short 'the Act') while canceling the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 1958 (HC)

Hamidbhai Weaving Mills Vs. Registrar, Bombay Industrial Relations Act ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1959)IILLJ101Bom

a concern will not be recognized for the purposes of industrial law and the old concern shall be deemed to be list of undertakings maintained by him under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. The undertaking was originally started by Appasaheb Dewal

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 03 1998 (HC)

Vineet Misra Vs. Reviewing Authority, Industrial Relation Departmental ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1998(4)AWC498

R. K. Mahajan, J.1. By this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 13 2002 (HC)

Bank Karmachari Sangh Vs. Assistant Registrar Under Bombay Industrial ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2002(95)FLR1014]; (2002)IIILLJ810Bom

the same has been quashed and set aside by the Industrial Court. The Asstt. Registrar is once again directed to decide employees should get determined at the earliest as the employer-employee relationship cannot be kept in an animated suspension. Under the law

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 17 1961 (HC)

Hailey Glass Works and ors. Vs. Deputy Labour Commissioner (industrial ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1962)IILLJ698All

it has jurisdiction to determine whether the dispute is an Industrial dispute or a particular employee Is a workman or not.10. the annexure; if so, with what details?J. Pkasad,Dy. Labour Commissioner(Industrial Relations), U. P.2. Before the tribunal could hear the dispute, the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 28 2004 (HC)

The Management of Best and Crompton Engg. Ltd. Rep. by General Manager ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2005)ILLJ168Mad; (2004)3MLJ668

Management, considered the case of this workman along with the industrial dispute 387/97 relating to Ananda Mohan, the cashier. The learned case of this workman along with the industrial dispute 387/97 relating to Ananda Mohan, the cashier. The learned Presiding Officer of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 2003 (HC)

Madura Coats Ltd. Rep. by Its Group Industrial Relations Manager Vs. P ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2004)IILLJ192Mad; (2004)1MLJ564

and Ramasamy, under the provisions of Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act (in short 'the I.D. Act'), for approval of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //