Industrial Employees - Judgment Search Results
Aviation Industry Employees Guild vs Air India Limited
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-01-2024
THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 12TH MAGHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 27606 OF 2015 PETITIONER: AVIATION INDUSTRY EMPLOYEES GUILD REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, GEORGE ABRAHAM, S/O.V.U.ABRAHAM, 3-D, BRENTWOOD MANOR, POWER HOUSE ROAD, KACHERYPPADY, ERNAKULAM. BY
Eveready Industries Employees Union Vs. Registrar Coop Housing Societi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-11-2013
MADRAS DATED:11. 2-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.28769 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Eveready Industries Employee's Union, Tamilnadu (Regn.No.135/CPT) 20/96B, Village Street, Sathuma Nagar, Chennai-600019, Rep. By Mr.N.Kabaleeswaran, General Secretary. .. Petitioner. Versus … (Housing), Chenglepet Region, 18, Varadarasanar Street, Vedachallam Nagar, Chenglepet-603 001.3. The Co-operative Sub Registrar/ Special Officer, Union Carbide, Employees Co-operative House Building Society Ltd., Regn. not G.S.3 134/A, 3rd Street, Union Carbide Colony, Kodingaiyur, Chennai-600 118. ..
Anchor Industries Employees' Union Vs. Anchor Industries and 33 Ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-01-2002
Reported in: (2003)3BOMLR698
filed by the Employees Union, the Union is challenging an order dated 30th December, 1995 passed by the Industrial Court, Maharashtra, Mumbai, whereby the Industrial Court has dismissed the complaint (ULP No. 337 of 1980 filed under
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Agra Engineering Industries Employees Union Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-11-2003
Reported in: (2003)3UPLBEC2375
application of the Company for closure of Respondent No. 2, establishment at Agra under Section 25-0 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and has further prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus to the respondents … Engineering Works Ltd., a Company incorporated under the Companies Act. Petitioner is a Union of Agra Engineering Industries employees. It has prayed for quashing the order dated 26.4.2002 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition), passed by the State
Modern Food Industries Employees Union Vs. Modern Food Industries and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-18-1999
Reported in: 1999IVAD(Delhi)413; 80(1999)DLT3; (2000)ILLJ227Del
practice reminiscent of primitive capitalism. It is humble submission that the same is not only legally untenable under Industrial Disputes Act, it is also opposed to human dignity, constitutional propriety and civilized norms of any society that … petition as under : 'It is humble submission of the petitioner that as against a strength of 250permanent employees,200 casual labourers have been engaged by the respondentNo.2 in different capacities such as operator, loader and peon for
Sundaram Industries Employees Union (Coach Division) Vs. Management of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2000
Reported in: (2000)IILLJ990Mad
reference to the transfer of nearly 100 workers of the petitioner union and it is stated that an industrial dispute was raised against the transfer of those workers. When the conciliation proceedings were pending regarding the question … entrance gate and took note of the abovesaid incident. It is stated that the management insisted on all employees to give an undertaking that they would not indulge in any unruly activity inside the factory and they
Sundaram Industries Employees' Union Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-05-2002
Reported in: (2003)IILLJ147Mad
Its workers are employed under the second respondent-management. The petitioner raised a dispute under Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The petitioner and the second respondent were before the conciliation officer. The conciliation officer sent his … claim is patently frivolous;(e) the impact of any claim in the general relations between the employer and the employees in the region is likely to be: adverse;(f) the person concerned is not a workman as defined by
Sreeshyla Industries Employees' Union Vs. State Bank of India and Anr. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-1983
Reported in: [1985]57CompCas639(Kar); 1984(2)KarLJ105
cls. (e) and (f) of s. 433 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, 'the Act'). 2. Shreeshyla Industrial Employees Union (Regd.) which claims to represent the workmen of the company is aggrieved by the order of the
Sreeshyla Industries Employees' Union Vs. State Bank of India and Ors. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-22-1983
Reported in: (1984)IILLJ451Kant
under Clauses (e) and (f) of S. 433 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, 'the Act'). 'Shreeshyla Industries Employees Union (Regd.)' which claims to represent the workmen of the Company is aggrieved by the order of
Rajasthan Small Industries Employees' Union Vs. State of Rajasthan and ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-11-1989
Reported in: (1993)IIILLJ361Raj; 1989(2)WLN682
the notice Annexure-2, dated June 28, 1983, issued by respondent No. 3, viz. the Managing Director, Rajasthan Small-Scale Industrial Corporation Limited. By the impugned notice Annexure-2, the Management of the Corporation decided to close down its one … S.S. Byas, J. 1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner which is an Employees' Union challenges the validity and correctness of the notice Annexure-2, dated June 28, 1983, issued by respondent No.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free