Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: industrial disputes banking companies decision act 1955 section 4 duration of the award Page 5 of about 275 results (0.096 seconds)

Dec 19 1997 (HC)

The Management, Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(1)CTC75

..... was concerned with the provisions of the contract labour (regulation and abolition) act as also of the industrial disputes act, and the discussion was in relation to the juristic entities constituted under the provisions of the companies act which are capable of being regarded as agents or instrumentalities of the state it is clear therefore, ..... . 423 had occasion to consider section 4(1)(c) of the act. the court, after examining the provisions of the state bank of india act and the banking companies act held that the banks constituted under those enactments though possessed of corporate personality and autonomous within the frame work of the statute were establishments 'under' the state ..... act 1947 will have no application in view of section 4(1)(c) of the act, whereunder establishments under the central and state government, reserve bank of india etc., are exempted from the provisions of the said act.4. the question that arises for consideration therefore is as to whether the commissioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 2014 (SC)

Ksl and Industries Ltd. Vs. M/S. Arihant Threads Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in ram narain vs. simla banking & industrial co. ltd.[2].. two statutes, both containing non-obstante clauses providing that the particular provisions of the act shall have effect (notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained therein in any other law for the time being in force) fell for consideration. the two acts were the banking company act 1949 and the displaced ..... must prevail over the former.45. in lic vs. d.j.bahadur[3]. this court considered the question as to which of the two laws i.e. the industrial disputes act, 1947 (the id act) and the life insurance corporation act, 1956 (the lic act), was a special law. having regard to the doctrine of generalia ..... act was special as regards nationalization of the life insurance business. but however, the disputes between employer and employee had to be dealt with under the id act which was a special law for resolving such disputes and if a dispute arose between employer and employee in the life insurance corporation, the lic act must be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 2015 (HC)

R.Nitya Vs. Dhanlaxmi Bank Limited

Court : Kerala

..... with regard to items 2 and 3 also. admittedly, the petitioner cannot be considered as a 'workman' within the definition of workman under the industrial disputes act. the dhanalaxmi bank, which is merely a private banking company, which is a schedule bank, is not a statutory body and therefore, the third category also do not come into play. o.p.(c)355 of 2015 -:18. :- 23 ..... (conduct and discipline) regulations. admittedly, the petitioner does not come within the purview of the definition of workman under the industrial disputes act. it is not disputed that nature of the employment of the petitioner and her services with the bank is by way of a contractual employment. o.p.(c)355 of 2015 -:12. :- 16. the next question to be considered is whether .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1967 (HC)

Ambika Tobacco Company, Gondia Vs. Labour Court, Nagpur and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1968)70BOMLR159; [1968(17)FLR105]; (1968)IILLJ353Bom; 1968MhLJ10

..... from the date of his joining as an accountant. after calculating the amount due to him he made an application under s. 33c(2) of the industrial disputes act for payment of that amount. the bank resisted the application on several grounds among others, that the application was not tenable under s. 33c(2), that the sastri award had ceased to ..... paid in terms of money and was well within the scope of s. 33c(2) of the industrial disputes act. 39. reference has also been made in the course of arguments on either side to the decision of the supreme court in savatram ramprasad mills company, ltd., akola v. baliram : (1966)illj41sc . the claim there was for payment of lay- ..... 36 of 1963) came in force, that there was no limitation for making an application under s. 33c(2) of the industrial disputes act. this has now been finally ruled by the decision of the supreme court in bombay gas company, ltd. v. gopal bhiva and others 1963 ii l.l.j. 608. there having been no provision for limitation for making .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1957 (HC)

Christopher Pimenta and ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1958Bom451; (1958)60BOMLR318

..... ' has nowhere been defined. that expression has been referred to at various places in the industrial disputes act, 1947, that expression has been used in defining a banking company in section 2(bb). under that section a 'banking company' has been defined to mean a banking company as defined in section 5 of the banking companies act, 1949 (x of 1949) having branches or other establishments in more than one ..... have ceased to bind the corporation under section 18(c) of the industrial disputes act.14. but the provisions of section 18(c) are not the only provisions which matter in this case. section 11 of the life insurance corporation act, 1956, in terms provides that the employees of various companies whose services have been transferred to the corporation are to hold their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 1998 (HC)

Cotton Corporation of India Limited,bangalore Vs. G.C. Odusumath and O ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR2553; 1998(6)KarLJ181; (1999)ILLJ19Kant

..... undertaking, the provisions of section 25ff of that act will apply. as a workman, he will under section 25ff of the industrial disputes act, become an employee of the new employer, viz., the company, which takes over the undertaking from the government which is the previous employer'.34. in its recent decision in the case of ..... 1947. this question was examined by the supreme court in the context of various provisions and the statutes by which the said banks were created i.e., state bank of india act, 1955 and the banking companies acquisition and transfer of undertaking act, 1970. evidently the said question has little relevance to the question involved for decision in ..... one hand, and the individual shareholders and their actions, assets, rights and liabilities on the other. (see ebm company limited v dominion bank). so, it legally follows that lifting of the corporation veil of a company as a rule is not permissible in law unless otherwise provided by clear words of the statute or by very .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 1951 (HC)

State Through Labour Inspector Vs. M.N. Mehrotra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1951All623

..... are claimed to have abated, reads as follows (irrelevant portions are omitted) : 'abatement of proceedings relating to disputes pending before provincial tribunals & reference of such disputes to tribunals constituted by the central govt.--(1) where any industrial dispute concerning any banking company or any matter relating to such dispute has, before the commencement of this ordinance, been referred by a provincial govt. to any tribunal or other ..... to the central govt. & the central govt. order that it shall cease to be in operation. 8. the ordinance prohibits a provincial govt. only from referring an industrial dispute concerning any banking or any matter relating to such dispute to any tribunal for adjudication, enquiry or settlement. this prohibition does not extend to prosecution for disobedience of an award. when a party to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1997 (HC)

Bari Doab Bank Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1998Delhi95; [1997]89CompCas438(Delhi)

..... scheme is sanctioned by the central government, intimated their intention of not becoming employees of the banking company on its reconstruction or, as the case may be, of the transferee bank, the payment to such employees of compensation, if any, to which they are entitled under the industrial disputes act, 1947, and such pension, gratuity, provident fund and other retirement benefits ordinarily admissible to them ..... years from the date of the payment or grant mentioned in that clause, to the reserve bank whose decision thereon shall be final; (j) notwithstanding anything contained in clause (i) where any of the employees of the banking company not being workmen within the meaning of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (14 of 1947), are specifically mentioned in the scheme under clause (i), or where .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 1978 (HC)

Anantray Jatashanker Trivedi Vs. Bank of Baroda

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1979)1GLR597

..... of settlement arrived at on 19-10-66 before the chief labour commissioner (central) new delhi in an industrial dispute between the managements of the banks as represented by the indian banks' association, bombay and the bombay exchange banks association, bombay and their workmen as represented by the ..... court has got jurisdiction to entertain an industrial dispute and the supreme court has laid down its propositions in clear and categorical terms in paragraphs 9 and 23 of its judgment. various terms and conditions of service, including the procedural safeguards, were settled between the parties in pursuance of a settlement arrived at between certain banking companies and their workmen, as per the memorandum .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1992 (HC)

K. Usha Vs. Indian Bank Represented by Its Chairman and Managing Direc ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1992)2MLJ366

..... held that the employees to be excluded have to be specifically mentioned in the draft scheme since the banking company and the transferee bank are entitled to object the scheme prepared by the reserve bank of india and make suggestions. under section 18(1) of the industrial disputes act, it is well settled that a settlement entered into under the said section is binding upon the ..... :(i) the continuance of the service of all the employees of the banking company (excepting such of them as not being workmen within the meaning of the industrial disputes act, 1947 are specifically mentioned in the scheme) in the banking company itself on its reconstruction or, as the case may be, in the transferee bank at the same remuneration and on the same terms and conditions of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //