Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: industrial disputes banking companies decision act 1955 section 4 duration of the award Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 9 results (0.217 seconds)

Bengal Provincial Bank Employees Association, Calcutta Vs. Salim M. Me ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1958Cal297

..... order 35, dated the 5th january, 1952, as modified by the decision of the labour appellate tribunal in the manner referred to in section 3 of the industrial disputes (banking companies) decision act, 1955 (41 of 1955), in respect of the matters specified in the schedule hereto annexed; now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by ..... be having died, was substituted by gajendragadkar j. on the 25th of july. 1955 the commission made its report and an act was passed namely the industrial disputes (banking companies) decision act, 1955 which came into operation on the 21st of october, 1955. it is stated in the preamble, to be an act to provide ..... day of january, 1952, as modified in the manner referred to in section 3 of the industrial disputes (banking companies) decision act, 1955 (41 of 1955), the demand for compensatory allowance by the workmen employed in west bengal in the banking companies specified in schedule i is maintainable; (b) if the demand is maintainable, what should be .....

K.M. Mukherjee Vs. Secretary and Treasurer, S.B.i. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1968Cal59,(1969)ILLJ50Cal

..... industrial tribunal becomes enforceable; section 18 enumerates the parties as between whom the award becomes enforceable and ..... in the decision in : (1961)iillj736cal , suprasad v. state bank of india, upon which mr. chakravarty for the petitioner relies.5. my attention was also drawn to section 4 of the industrial disputes (banking companies) decision act, 1955. section 17-a of the industrial disputes act lays down the point of time when an award of an ..... desai j. of the bombay high court was set up by the government of india, and several disputes relating to banking companies and their employees were referred to this tribunal under section 10 of the industrial disputes act. the award given by this tribunal in the year 1962 it known as the desai award. it .....

Eastern Bank, Ltd. Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1966)ILLJ647Cal

..... june 19637. whether having regard to the provisions of para. 529 of the award of the all india industrial tribunal (bank disputes) as modified by the decision of the labour appellate tribunal in the manner referred to in section 3 of the industrial disputes (banking companies) decision act, 1955 (41 of 1955), the promotion of b. burman, t. n. guha roy ..... 1963b26. whether having regard to the provisions of para. 529 of the award of the all india industrial tribunal (bank disputes) as modified by the decision of the labour appellate tribunal in the manner referred to in section 3 of the industrial disputes (banking companies) decision act, 1955 (41 of 1955), the promotion of b. burman, t.n. guha ..... petitioner and its employees used to be governed by the terms of an all-india award known as ' sastri award ' as modified by the industrial disputes (banking companies) decision act (41 of 1955). the sastri award was replaced by a subsequent all-india award known as the ' desai award,' with effect .....

Birla Corporation Ltd. Vs. First Industrial Tribunal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(2)CHN13,[2006(110)FLR136],(2006)IIILLJ84Cal

..... with, by the employees. thus, mr. mitra contended that if the employees have no say in the decision making process of the management of the company, the birth of an industrial dispute in this regard cannot be contemplated.15. with regard to the other impugned order by which the continuance of suspension of work, i.e., lockout in ..... provision as mentioned in item no. 6 of the second schedule, such dispute cannot loose the character of an industrial dispute. reliance was made by mr. bandopadhyay in this regard on a decision of the madras high court in the case of general secretary, national grindlays bank employees union, madras v. kannan and ors. reported in 1978 lab. ..... court in its constitutional writ jurisdiction. in support of such statement, mr. mitra relied upon a decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of anz grindlays bank ltd, v. union of india and ors. reported in : air2006sc296 .14. relying upon another decision of the bombay high court in the case of hindustan lever .....

Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. Ivth Industrial Tribunal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [2007(113)FLR1090]

..... last year of their service, which may be declared in the year following their retirement can never be raised as an industrial dispute. in my opinion, the dispute though primarily concerning retired workmen of the respondent-company is a dispute which ultimately concerns the existing workmen as well and that entitles them to espouse the cause of their quondam workers.it ..... of india and ors. 2001 (91) lr 7 (sc). it appears that in the said decision the hon'ble supreme court was also pleased to consider all india reserve bank retired officers association and ors. 1992 (64) flr 16 (sc) case (vide supra), and the hon'ble supreme court in para 19, at page 11 of subrata ..... them can be termed as an 'industrial dispute.' for the purpose of deciding such question, the said reported case cannot be of any help.40. in subrata sen and ors. : 2001 (91) flr 761 (sc) cases (vide supra), the hon'ble supreme court was pleased to consider the case of all india reserve bank retired officers association 1992 (64) .....

United Bank of India Vs. Ram Raj Goala

Court : Kolkata

..... had no jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit. the defendants contended that the plaintiff being an armed guard of the defendant no. 1 bank was a workman as defined in the industrial disputes act and the remedy is available to the plaintiff under the said act and the civil court had no jurisdiction to try the suit. it ..... made in the case of p.s. gceta v. the central bank of india (1978) labour and industrial cases 1271, it was held in the said case that whatever may have been the position with regard to the validity of the rules before the banks were acquired under the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of under takings) act, 1970, after ..... under section 115 of the code of civil procedure.6. mr. ganguly next contended that under the provisions of section 3(4) of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970 the bank in question became a body corporate and under the provisions of section 12(2) of the said act, every officer or other employees shall, .....

Tushar Kanti Ray Vs. Second Industrial Tribunal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2004)IIILLJ1065Cal

..... order dated september 20, 1993 the first respondent had approved the order of dismissal under section 33(2)(b) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the said act), made by the respondent company. the second] mentioned order was passed on an application for review of the first mentioned order, whereby and whereunder the ..... on reference being made by mother bench of the supreme court observing :hat there was conflict between the two' decisions rendered in case of shambhu nath goyal v. bank of baroda : (1983)iillj415sc and of rajendra jha v. presiding officer labour court : (1984)iillj459sc . their lordships in this case observed that there was no ..... the management to adduce evidence before the tribunal/labour court, we are of the opinion that the directions issued by this court in shambhu nath goyal v. bank of baroda : (1983)iillj415sc need not be varied being just and fair. there be no complaint from the management side for this procedure because this opportunity .....

Ram Kr. Tewari Vs. the Asstt. General Manager (Ccr), Bank of Baroda an ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1998)3CALLT253(HC)

..... to the intent that the settlement shall be binding on the banks and the workmen in the manner contemplated in section 18 of the industrial disputes act. 1947'. 'it was argued on behalf of the petitioner that in view of section 12(2) of the banking companies (acquisition of transfer of undertakings) act. 1970 (hereinafter referred to ..... as the said act) every officer or other employee of an 'existing bank' became, on the commencement of ..... section 19 of the said act, the parties to the bipartite settlement agreed that the settlement shall be binding on the banks and workmen in the manner contemplated in section 18 of the industrial disputes act 1947. therefore, this court is of the view that the provisions contained in the bipartite settlement can not be .....

Bata India Ltd. Vs. Seventh Indl. Tribunal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1993)2CALLT386(HC),1993(2)CHN464,98CWN659,(1995)ILLJ144Cal

..... an order dated 26th of december, 1984 and on the same day an application was made under section 33(2)(b) of the industrial disputes act by the writ petitioner company before the 7th industrial tribunal, west bengal for approval of such order. by an order dated september 20, 1988 tribunal rejected the said application and refused to accord approval to such order of ..... said act by the tribunal although may make the order of dismissal void ab-initio, as held by the supreme court in the case of p.d. sharma v. state bank of india and the workman concerned deems to continue in service, the same is really by a fiction of law. factually and effectually, however, the workman concerned is restored back ..... of section 17b of the said act.7. it is true, as pointed out by mr. ginwala, that the supreme court in the case of p.d. sharma v. state bank of india reported in (1969-i-llj-513) has held inter alia that if the approval under section 33(2)(b) of the said act is not accorded, the action .....

Dipankar Sengupta and anr. Vs. United Bank of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1998(79)FLR212],(1999)ILLJ208Cal

..... authority could not have consulted the central vigilance commission. in ramkumar v. state of haryana (supra), the apex court was dealing with a matter under the industrial disputes act. the apex court has laid down the law in the following terms at p. 505-506: 'in view of the contents of the impugned order, ..... consideration or such recommendations were made with any ill motive or malafide. it is further not disputed that the 18 companies said to be connected with hemraj mahabir prasad group had been enjoying the substantial credit facilities with the bank. 12. the entire charges levelled as against the writ petitioners would show that they were ..... runs as under: 'misconduct' means, misconduct arising from ill motive; acts of negligence, errors of judgment, or innocent mistake, do not constitute such misconduct. in industrial jurisprudence amongst others, habitual or gross negligence constitute misconduct but in utkal machinery ltd. v. workman, miss shanti patnaik (1966-i-llj-398) (sc), in the .....