Industrial Dispute - Judgment Search Results

Narendra Kumar Sen and ors. Vs. All India Industrial Disputes (Labour ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1953Bom325; (1953)55BOMLR125; ILR1954Bom260; (1953)IILLJ6Bom

it was suggested that if a dispute was not an industrial dispute, the appropriate Government would not refer that dispute to Legislature has included in the definition of the expression 'industrial dispute' all disputes provided they are connected with the employment or

Roche Anglo-french Employees' Union, Bombay Vs. Conciliation Officer, ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1985(51)FLR244]; (1987)IILLJ169Bom; 1986MhLJ308

cannot be issued against them. It was further submitted that Industrial adjudication is a distinct branch of the jurisprudence which is of the employer imposed by the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act being not merely on the interests of individual workman

Ganesh Lal Vs. the Judge, Industrial Disputes Tribunal and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: [2007(113)FLR780]; RLW2007(2)Raj1222

year. Considering the material placed before the Industrial Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal came to the conclusion that the workman was not Supreme Court held that it is beyond any doubt or dispute that a daily-wager does not hold a post. The Forest

Poonam Chand Panchariya Vs. the Judge, Industrial Disputes Tribunal an ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2009(2)WLN54

made a reference by notification dt. 20.04.1999 to the respondent Industrial Disputes Tribunal and Labour Court, Jodhpur (for short 'the Labour or the Tribunal with a view to settle the industrial dispute keeping in mind the sense of doing complete justice to

Anil Kumar Vs. Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute Tribunal

Court: Punjab and Haryana

has held that the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short the Act.) were inapplicable where held that the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short the Act.) were inapplicable where the