Induction - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: induction Page 1 of about 13 results (0.016 seconds)R.K. Induction Industries P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1998)(97)ELT342TriDel
Rs. 50,000/- on appellants No. 1, that is, M/s. R.K. Induction Industries P. Ltd. is concerned, in view of my findings
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJharkhand Induction Furnace Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity
Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Reported in: (2007)LCAPTEL1241
on an application filed by the appellant namely, the Jharkhand Induction Furnace Association, an Association of consumers of Electricity of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPillar Induction (India) P. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT837TriDel
more appropriately classifiable under CET sub-heading 8514.00 as parts of induction furnace and bus bars are appropriately classifiable under CET sub-heading
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPillar Induction India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (2005)(184)ELT363Tri(Chennai)
reference to transfer of technical know-how for a medium frequency induction furnace. The said agreement has since expired and the appellant
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPillar Inductions (i) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC352
that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Electric Induction Furnaces falling under sub-heading 8514.00 of the CETA, 1985. They
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Induction Castings (P) Ltd. Vs. General Manager, District Indus ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Reported in: (1997)116PLR100
The petitioner established an industrial unit namely Modern D.C. Electric Induction Furnace at the Industrial Belt of Faridabad. The petitioner's unit
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMandi Gobindgarh Induction Furnace Association (Regd.) Vs. Punjab Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Hemant Gupta, J. Challenge in the present writ petition is to Regulation 15 of the Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Pillar Induction (i) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (2003)(155)ELT498Tri(Chennai)
1. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) by which he...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.A. Varma, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Laxmi Induction a ...
Court: Gujarat
Reported in: [1995]216ITR555(Guj)
K.J. Vaidya, J. 1. Quite an important question that arises for consideration in the present group of 11 criminal revision...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR. A. Varma, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Laxmi Induction ...
Court: Gujarat
Reported in: (1997)138CTR(Guj)35
K. J. VAIDYA, J. :Quite an important question that arises for consideration in the present group of 11 criminal revision...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>