Inducteous - Judgment Search Results

Mandi Gobindgarh Induction Furnace Association (Regd.) Vs. Punjab Stat ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Hemant Gupta, J. Challenge in the present writ petition is to Regulation 15 of the Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code and Related Matter) Regulations, 2007 (for short the Regulations), as amended vide notification...

Indian Induction Castings (P) Ltd. Vs. General Manager, District Indus ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1997)116PLR100

of commencement of the industry of the petitioner.2. The petitioner established an industrial unit namely Modern D.C. Electric Induction Furnace at the Industrial Belt of Faridabad. The petitioner's unit was registered as a small scale unit. The

Pillar Inductions (i) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC352

order.2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Electric Induction Furnaces falling under sub-heading 8514.00 of the CETA, 1985. They have cleared the goods viz.Induction Furnace to Central

Pillar Induction India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2005)(184)ELT363Tri(Chennai)

paid to M/s.Pillar Corporation, USA in 1985 with reference to transfer of technical know-how for a medium frequency induction furnace. The said agreement has since expired and the appellant is free to manufacture without further payment of

Jharkhand Induction Furnace Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in: (2007)LCAPTEL1241

Case No. 5/2004-05. The Impugned Order was passed on an application filed by the appellant namely, the Jharkhand Induction Furnace Association, an Association of consumers of Electricity of the HTSS category. The Commission had issued its Tariff

R.K. Induction Industries P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)(97)ELT342TriDel

The first appellants, M/s. R.K. Induction Industries P. Ltd. are engaged in the manufacture of MS ingots and were during the material period for

Pillar Induction (India) P. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT837TriDel

appeal relates to classification of two products manufactured by the appellants herein who are manufacturers inter alia of induction furnace : 2. The contention of the Revenue is that both items are electric conductors falling for classification

R.A. Varma, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Laxmi Induction a ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1995]216ITR555(Guj)

K.J. Vaidya, J. 1. Quite an important question that arises for consideration in the present group of 11 criminal revision applications is regarding the interpretation of the expression 'shall also be liable to fine equal to...

R. A. Varma, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Laxmi Induction ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1997)138CTR(Guj)35

K. J. VAIDYA, J. :Quite an important question that arises for consideration in the present group of 11 criminal revision applications is regarding the interpretation of the expression 'shall also be liable to fine equal to...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Pillar Induction (i) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2003)(155)ELT498Tri(Chennai)

1. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) by which he has accepted the respondents' contention that the power supply units i.e. Control Panels intended for distribution...