Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 preamble 1 indo tibetan border police force act 1992 Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 2,137 results (0.320 seconds)

Rabindranath Mishra Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2008Ori19

..... other armed forces of the union.13. the crpf is one of the armed forces of the union like bsf, cisf, assam rifles, indo-tibetan border security force, s.s. b. security force and rapid action force. in this regard, section 3 of the c.r.p.f. ..... in view of the above discussion, we have no doubt in our mind that the central reserve police force is an armed force of the union like border security force and the cisf.17. now we come to the provision of reservation made in paragraph ..... of the force-(1) there shall continue to be an armed force maintained by the central government and called the central reserve police force.(2) the force shall be constituted in such manner, and the members of the force ghaty receive such pay, pension and ..... action (ii) permanently disabled in action and (iii) serving.11. now the first question arises as to whether the central reserve police force of which the petitioner is a member would come under armed forces or paramilitary forces. in this regard, it is necessary to .....

Maganti Veerabhadrayya Vs. Sree Rajah Bommadevara Naganna Nayudu Bahad ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1927)52MLJ38

Krishnan, J.1. I have had the advantage of reading the judgment my learned brother has prepared in this case. The main question is whether at the time the defendant was put in possession of the lands they were ryoti lands or the private or kamatam lands of the Zamindar. The 1st defendant's claim to permanent right of occupancy in them is based on Clause 1, Section 6 of the Estates Land Act and for that clause to apply the land.must be a 'ryoti land not being old waste'. Private land is excluded from ryoti land by its definition in Section 3, Clause (16). It is argued that though these lands were, prior to 1877 or 188o? such as would have fallen within the definition of ryoti lands under the Act they had been effectively converted into kamatam lands before the Act was passed. My learned brother has dealt with this question exhaustively and as I agree with him I do not propose to go over the same ground. In this connection it was argued by the learned vakil for the appellant that the eff...

Dayaldas Khushiram Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, (Central), Bombay.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1943]11ITR67(Bom)

JUDGEMENT OF APPELLATE TRIBUNALUnder Section 33 of the Indian Income-tax Act (XI of 1922) the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, (Bombay Branch) (consisting of N. R. GUNDIL, Judicial Member, and P. C. MALHOTRA, Accountant Member) delivered the following judgment on August 23, 1941 :-'These two appeals arise out of a supplementary assessment of the appellant, Mr. Dayaldas Khushiram, for the assessment year 1937-38, made by the Income-tax Officer, Section II (Central), under Section 23(4) and Section 34 of the Income-tax Act. The appellant applied, under Section 27, to cancel the best judgment assessment, but the Income-tax Officer dismissed the application. The appellant took that order, as well as the order of assessment, in appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner who, in each case, declined to interfere. These two appeals are respectively taken from his orders, and involve common facts. They were heard together, and may be conveniently disposed of in one judgment. The facts will ma...

Debi Prasad Vs. Bhagwati Prasad and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1943All63

Dar J.1. This is an appeal against a judgment and decree dated 12th September 1939 of the Civil Judge of Mirzapur by which he partly varied a judgment and decree of the Munsif of Mirzapur dated 5th November 1938, in a suit for recovery of money on the basis of a sarkhat. The plaintiff Debi Prasad is the proprietor of a firm of money-lenders called Debi Prasad Bhagwan Dass at Mirzapur. The defendants Bhagwati Prasad and Buddhu Lal who are two own brothers also own a firm at Mirzapur called the firm Bhagwati Prasad Buddhu Lal. On 20th January 1930, defendant 1 Bhagwati Prasad borrowed a sum of Rs. 1200 from Bam Dass, the father of the plaintiff, and executed a promissory note in his favour bearing interest at 6 percent. per annum. Some time after the execution of this promissory note Ram Dass died, and the plaintiff Debi Prasad succeeded to the family money-lending business. On 31st December 1935, the account between the plaintiff and defendant 1 with regard to the promissory note of 193...

Shri Krishna Sharma Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1954Cal591,58CWN659

..... grounds served upon them without necessary license or permit or in violation of the relevant orders in force at the relevant time.apart from the anglo-tibetan trade regulations of 1914, nothing was pointed out to us on behalf of the petitioners showing that free export of the commodities in question was permitted ..... .the tripartite convention of 1914 expressly cancelled the existing trade regulations, viz., the tibet trade regulations of 1893 and 1904 (article 7(a) ) and the tibetan government engaged to negotiate new trade regulations (article7(b) ). it was in these circumstances that the anglo-tibet trade regulations of 1914 were negotiated. the primary ..... and accepted as binding by them as between themselves. by article 7 of this convention the tibet trade regulations of 1893 and 1908 were cancelled and the tibetan government undertook to negotiate with the british government new trade regulations. in pursuance of this undertaking, 'anglo-tibet trade regulations, 1914' were signed on .....

Manorama Bai Vs. Rama Bai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1957Mad269

..... defendant can be discarded as interested and was so discarded by the learned subordinate judge. in regard to d. w. 1 who is the station house officer of mangalore north police station and who held the inquest, he has naturally no personal knowledge of the tragedy that took place on the previous evening. therefore, in this state of divided evidence, two .....

N.N. Ananthanarayana Iyer and ors. Vs. Agricultural Income Tax and Sal ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1959Ker182

Varadaraja Iyengar, J.1. These nine Original Petitions arise out of nine separate assessments of the respective Petitioners for the financial year 1957-58 under the Travancore-Cochin Agricultural Income-tax Act, 22 of 1950 as amended by Act 8 of 1957. By virtue of the amendment, the principal Act had been extended on 6-8-1957 to the whole of Kerala including the former Malabar District but with effect from. 1-4-1957. The Income-tax Officers concerned required the various Petitioners to include in their returns their agricultural income derived from land situated in Malabar and received by them during their previous year, i.e. the year ending on 31-3-1957 or on any day anterior to it but within that year as the case may be.Now the former Malabar District was dis-integrated from the Madras State and became part of Kerala only as and from 1-11-1956. The income of the 'previous year' directed to be returned as above and sought to be made liable comprised therefore to major extent or in who...

K.M. Nanavati Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC112; (1961)63BOMLR221; 1961CriLJ173; [1961]1SCR497

..... s. 302 of the indian penalcode. he was produced before the additional chief presidency magistrate,greater bombay, in connection with that charge on april 28, 1959. themagistrate remanded him to police custody on that day. on the following day(april 29, 1959) the magistrate received a letter from the flag officer,bombay, to the effect that he was ready and willing .....

Baker Vs. Carr

Court : US Supreme Court

Baker v. Carr - 369 U.S. 186 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) Baker v. Carr No. 6 Argued April 19-20, 1961 Set for reargument May 1, 1961 Reargued October 9, 1961 Decided March 26, 1962 369 U.S. 186 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE Syllabus Appellants are persons allegedly qualified to vote for members of the General Assembly of Tennessee representing the counties in which they reside. They brought suit in a Federal District Court in Tennessee under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 1988, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, to redress the alleged deprivation of their federal constitutional rights by legislation classifying voters with respect to representation in the General Assembly. They alleged that, by means of a 1901 statute of Tennessee arbitrarily and capriciously apportioning the seats in the General Assembly among the State's 95 counties, and a failure to reapportion them subsequent...

The State and anr. Vs. Maharajkumar Saday Chand Mahtab and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1966Cal217,1966CriLJ530

..... sessions judge.. .. .. .. .. may thereupon, instead of directing a fresh enquiry, order him to be committed for trial.. ,. .. .. '. mr. dutta appearing for madheswar pathak argued that the police diary of which copies were furnished could be looked into by the sessions judge during enquiry under section 436 criminal procedure code, only for ordering further investigation and not for any other ..... is some ground as opposed to 'no ground' in which case the order of discharge shall follow. (3) if the prima facie case be far from the border line leaning in favour of the accused it is better that the magistrate should commit. (4) if the papers as placed before the teamed magistrate do not make ..... his trial. what those cases would be, which would satisfy the test, may not generally be stated here, because, in our opinion, this case is far from the border line, where only difficulties are likely to be met.' 9. in this connection, we may also refer to a decision passed by our court (j. p. mitter and .....