Court : Delhi
Reported in : [1998]231ITR318(Delhi); [1998]97TAXMAN144(Delhi)
..... east of kailash are superior than those in a-block. we are also conscious of the status and standing of the transferor who was a meritorious officer of the indian police service, although this factor is extraneous to the issue being dealt with by us.'regarding the adjustments, the following reasons are given by the appropriate authority :'as regards the adjustments .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1995Delhi49
..... and give for the purposes of human consumption. if this exercise is carried out at the place from where the animals are picked up or at least at the border, in that event the diseased animals or animals which are otherwise unfit for human consumption may not even be transported from that point to the abattoir.73. he ..... of sheep/goat should be increased from rs. 50 to rs. 500 and for buffalo from rs. 200 to rs. 2000.(b) the s.h.o. of every police station should be directed and made responsible to check, detect, and apprehend persons committing the offence of illegal slaughtering in conformity with the public notice no. 4310|dhy|ph| ..... there is continued gross violation of the provisions of prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960 the delhi police has been negligent in taking action against the offenders. chapter 9 of the delhi police act, 1978 gives special powers to the police to take action against persons responsible for the cruelty to animals.13. the petitioner has also made reference .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : II(1990)BC51; [1992]73CompCas701(Delhi); 41(1990)DLT359; 1990RLR252
Mahinder Narain, J.(1) By this order, I propose to deal with an interim application bearing I.A. No. 3945 of 1989, filed by the Nangia Construction (India) Private Ltd (hereinafter called the Petitioners) in Suit No. 1375-A of 1989. (2) Suit No. 1375-A of 1989 has been filed under section 20 of the Arbitration Act. (3) The interim application I.A. No. 3945 of 1989 has been filed under action 41 read with Second Schedule of the Arbitration Act 1940, and section 151 of the Code Civil Procedure. By the said interim application, the. applicant/petitioner prays that respondent No. 1 National Buildings Construction Corporation Ltd., and respondent No. 2, the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the National Buildings Construction Corporation Ltd., be restrained from terminating the contract which contains an arbitration clause, it is also prayed that the National Building Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter called 'the NBCC'), be restrained from encashing to bank guarantees No. NP/G/16/136 and NP/G/1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : AIR1992Delhi118; 1992(1)ARBLR242(Delhi); 48(1992)DLT414
ORDER1. Vide this Order I shall decide the aforesaid two applications moved by the defendants seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule I I of the Code of Civil Procedure.2. Elaborate oral arguments have been addressed by counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the applicants had addressed very brief oral arguments, however, both the parties have filed written arguments. I have gone through them thoroughly.3. Facts of the case as averred by the plaintiff, in brief, are that his late grandfather Pt. Lakshmi Chandra constituted a Joint Hindu Family with his two sons, namely, Pratap Chand and D. C. Kaushish defendant No. I and owned and possessed moveable and immoveable properties. The immoveable properties are described in Schedule A to the plaint. Pratap Chand is stated to have died issueless in 1916. Pt. Lakshmi Chand had died on February 10, 1934. D. C. Kaushish defendant No. I then became Karta of the Joint Hindu Undivided Family comprising of himself, his wife defendant No...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : (1991)101CTR(Del)81; 47(1992)DLT144; ILR1992Delhi656; [1992]195ITR338(Delhi)
B.N. Kirpal, J. (1) The challenge in this writ petition is to the order passed under Section 269 UD(1) by the Appropriate Authority under the Income-tax Act (respondent No. 2), whereby it has decided to purchase the flat which was to be sold pursuant to a letter of allotment which had been issued by M/s Ansal Propel ties and Industries Ltd. (respondent No. 4) in favor of the petitioner. (2) Briefly stated the facts are that one Smt. Satyawanti Dhawan (respondent No. 5) is the owner of plot No. 6, Jantar Mantar Road, New Delhi. On 4th September, 1979 she entered into an agreement with M/s Competent Builders. As per the terms of the said agreement M/s Competent Builders was to develop this property and construct a multi-storeyed residential building. According to the terms of the agreement the entire building was to be constructed by M/s Competent Builders out of its own resources and 35% of the saleable area on all the floors was to be allotted to the owner. The balance area could be so...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1993CriLJ336; 46(1992)DLT35; 1992(22)DRJ34; 1991(1)DRJ(Suppl)188
..... and high courts. one of us, wadhwa j' had in the past eloquently commented on the continued strike by tis hazari lawyers after the alleged charge by the police officers in tis hazari compound. as citizens lawyers are entitled to democratic protests, but the limits of protests are crossed when the strikes are continued for indefinite period. ..... .(30) we can also not ignore the impact of such incidents on the administrative staff of the high court and the district court, the litigating public and the police that have witnessed the onslaught on the courts. they were dazed to see the near complete collapse of the judicial administration on 26.9.91.(31) we are ..... fair. in a recent decision of the supreme court in delhi judicial service association v. state of gujarat writ petition (cri.) 517/1988 popularly known as the nadiad police case, the supreme court had evolved its own procedure under article 129 (akin to article 215), irrespective of the procedure laid down by the contempt of courts act. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 47(1992)DLT575
..... he had failed to do so. he was once again advised to report to the unit within 10 days. failing which necessary apprehension roll for apprehension by the civil police authorities would beissued. the petitioner did not report for duty and on the contrary served the respondents with a legal notice dated 19/07/1988, to the effect that ..... being conducted against one of the other members of thestaff.(2) the brief facts, which are relevant for the present controversy, are that the petitioner joined service in the border roads organisation of the general reserve engineer force as a civilian superintendent b/r grade ii on 3/08/1966. he was promoted as superintendent b/r grade i as ..... m. nayar, j.(1) the present petition is directed against (a)apprehension roll, issued vide no. 1011/219/14/e dated 17/09/1988,by the respondent border roads organisation, on the ground, that the petitioner was absent without leave with effect from 26/05/1988, and thus committed a cognizable offence under section 39 of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1992Delhi1158
P.K. Bahri, J.1. This is a suit seeking separation of the shares of the plaintiffs after due partition of the joint properties. Plaintiffs No. 1 and 2 are the sons of defendant No. 1 whereas plaintiff No. 4 and defendant No. 2 are the daughters of defendant No. 1 and plaintiff No. 3 is the wife of defendant No. 1. Plaintiffs 1, 2 & 4 were minors at the time of the filing of this suit and the suit was brought through their mother and next friend, plaintiff No. 3. The plaintiffs 1, 2 & 4 had since become major and had elected to continue this suit. Unfortunately Plaintiff No. 2 Maharajkumar Amanjit Singh died on 10th November, 1991. He had died intestate and his estate is inherited by his mother Plaintiff No. 3. 2. The case set up by the plaintiffs in brief is that the plaintiffs and defendants constituted Hindu undivided family (HUF) and all of them have been joint in estate and worship and up to August, 1976, they were also joint in mess. It is averred that defendant No. 1 had deserted...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : (1992)105CTR(Del)249
P. K. BAHRI, J. :This is a suit seeking separation of the shares of the plaintiffs after due partition of the joint properties. Plaintiffs No. 1 and 2 are the sons of defendant No. 1 whereas plaintiff No. 4 and defendant No. 2 are the daughters of defendant No. 1 and plaintiff No. 3 is the wife of defendant No. 1. Plaintiffs 1, 2 & 4 were minors at the time of the filing of this suit and the suit was brought through their mother and next friend, plaintiff No. 3. The plaintiffs 1, 2 & 4 had since become major and had elected to continue this suit. Unfortunately Plaintiff No. 2 Maharajkumar Amanjit Singh died on 10th November, 1991. He had died intestate and his estate is inherited by his mother Plaintiff No. 3.2. The case set up by the plaintiffs in brief is that the plaintiffs and defendants constituted Hindu undivided family (HUF) and all of them have been joint in estate and worship and up to August, 1976, they were also joint in mess. It is averred that defendant No. 1 had deserted ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Reported in : (1992)42ITD135(Delhi)
..... to necessarily pass through the octroi posts of each of the states. the octroi authorities after charging the requisite octroi, allow the goods to pass through the state borders.the octroi receipts as issued by the authorities, indicate the nature of the goods on which, they had levied the octroi. referring to these octroi receipts, he pleaded ..... denied of having any knowledge about this concern. the inspector, stated that, he could not locate that party at its location, despite seeking the help of the police and the property dealers.10. ao then called upon the assessee. to file the receipts of octroi to verify the movement of the cylinders from pcpl to the ..... that they clearly indicate that, the goods that passed through the border was gas cylinders.24. shri agarwal made reference to the statement of kkg and submitted that kkg had full knowledge about the transactions of the appellant and pcpl, .....
Tag this Judgment!