Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 preamble 1 indo tibetan border police force act 1992 Page 1 of about 2,101 results (0.676 seconds)

Sep 26 2007 (HC)

Rabindranath Mishra Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2008Ori19

..... other armed forces of the union.13. the crpf is one of the armed forces of the union like bsf, cisf, assam rifles, indo-tibetan border security force, s.s. b. security force and rapid action force. in this regard, section 3 of the c.r.p.f. ..... in view of the above discussion, we have no doubt in our mind that the central reserve police force is an armed force of the union like border security force and the cisf.17. now we come to the provision of reservation made in paragraph ..... of the force-(1) there shall continue to be an armed force maintained by the central government and called the central reserve police force.(2) the force shall be constituted in such manner, and the members of the force ghaty receive such pay, pension and ..... action (ii) permanently disabled in action and (iii) serving.11. now the first question arises as to whether the central reserve police force of which the petitioner is a member would come under armed forces or paramilitary forces. in this regard, it is necessary to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2012 (HC)

Mukesh Kumar Sharma Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

..... , 2011 sent by the respondents stating that the petitioners trial was tentatively scheduled in the second week of january, 2012.2. the respondents purported to have exercised jurisdiction under the indo tibetan border police force act, 1992 (itbpf act, 1992) and the rules framed thereunder. the challenge by the petitioner rests primarily on the contention that the proposed action of the respondents was statutorily ..... under section 58 of the itbpf act, 1992.3. to the extent necessary, the facts giving rise to the petition are briefly noticed hereafter.4. the petitioner was enrolled in indo tibetan border police (itbp in short) on 31st august, 1988 as a sub-inspector. while posted on 15th january, 2009 with the 32nd battalion of the itbp, the petitioner was given the responsibility .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2000 (HC)

Sher Singh, Ex. Head Constable Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2000)125PLR264

..... passed by respondents no.3 and 2 respectively confirming the orders of the 4th respondent dated 22.4.1997.2. the petitioner was working as head constable in indo tibetan border police force (hereinafter referred to as itbpf). he was tried by the court martial for the following charges:-a) failed in exchange of guards in time as per ..... .3. the summary court force initiated proceedings against him. the above charges have been framed on the following averments:4. the petitioner as a member of the indo tibetan border police force was deputed for guard duty in state bank of india, kikar branch, bathinda. according to the petitioner, he was on duty on 31.1.1997 from ..... before him and he was also found to have consumed liquor. then he directed bhagwan singh, assistant commander to file the f.i.r. with the local police. he further stated that both the first and second guard commanders were jointly and separately responsible for the security and discipline of the guard personnel. when petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Arun Bansal Advocate Vs. the Central Govt. Through Secret ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... mr.gurpreet singh, advocate, senior panel counsel for union of india. ***** ranjit singh, j. an important question of law relating to holding of re-trial of a person serving in indo tibetan border police force (for short, itbpf .) after setting-aside an earlier trial, is raised in the present petition. in the absence of any provision permitting retrial, the question raised would deserve ..... . again a division bench of the delhi high court had the occasion to deal with the provisions of re-trial in respect of a person subject to the jurisdiction of border security force act. in the case of nirmal lakra versus union of india, 2003 (2) s.c.t.588, the division bench has held that the earlier trial ..... revoking and suspension period of both the persons w.e.f.12.5.2k to 8.89.2k is treated as duty for all purposes. sd/-commandant xith bn.itb. police . consequent to passing of order, annexure p-5, the petitioners were once again subjected to trial by sfc, which was held on 3.11.2000. they were found .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 1994 (SC)

Narottam Dass Beshtoo Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1995SC1154; JT1994(5)SC644; 1995LabIC1596; (1995)ILLJ564SC; 1994(4)SCALE25; 1994Supp(3)SCC264; [1994]Supp2SCR670; 1994(2)LC643(SC)

..... the aforesaid rules do not at all deal with the mode of enrolment of lower division clerks. the same is governed by what has been provided in indo-tibetan border police force (lower division clerk) recruitment rules, 1973 which were made by the president of india in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to article 309 ..... states that mode of enrolment and procedure of enrolment shall be such as may be prescribed. learned counsel then speaks to draw assistance from rule 187 of the indo-tibetan border police force rules, 1994 which is on the subject of 'transitory provision' and states that any rule or order applicable to the force on commencement of these rules ..... union', the incumbents have to be taken as members of this force, because of the definition of this expression as given in section 2(1)(p) of the indo-tibetan border police force act, 1992, for short, the act. this submission is countered by shri vaje appearing for the union of india, because according to him, apart from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2008 (HC)

Hardyal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)2PLR142

..... petitioner has not completed 20 years of qualifying service and, thus, he is not entitled to pension under rule 48-a of 1972 pension rules and that the provisions of indo-tibetan border police act, 1992 (hereinafter to be referred as 'itbp act') and the rules framed thereunder are not applicable in view of section 157 of the itbp act as the ..... rule 49(2)(b) of the central civil services (pension) rules, 1972 (hereinafter to be referred as '1972 pension rules'.2. the petitioner was enrolled as constable in indo tibetan border police (hereinafter to be referred as 'itbp') on 02.04.1965. he resigned in the year 1976 on account of illness of his father which was allowed and he was made ..... by the petitioner on the judgment in raj kumar v. union of india : air2006sc938 is not tenable. the rule discussed in the aforesaid case was rule 19 of border security force rules, 1969 wherein an amendment was carried out on 27.12.1995 so as to grant pension to a member of the force who resigned from the force .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 1997 (HC)

Jaswant Rai JaIn Vs. Surinderpal Singh Bhuttal and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)116PLR121

..... 1979. this fact is established from letter dated 18.10.79 (at page 237 of the record of the executing court), issued from the office of deputy inspector general, (hp), indo-tibetan border police (mha), goi, pb. no. 1, gpo simla-1 signed by k.s. yadav, commandant staff (hp), addressed to brig. gurkirpal singh, v & p.o, bhandohar, ..... :registered a.d.no. itbp-hp/qm/accomn/(3)/78 4608office of the dy inspector general (hp), indo-tibetan border police, (ministry of home affairs) government of india.p.b. no. 1, gpo simladated 18th october, 1979fromthe office of dy. inspector general (hp),indo-tibetan border police (mha), goi,p.b.no. 1, gpo simla-1.tobrig. gurkirpal singh,vill. & p.o. ..... . gurkirpal singh (retd) who has been given the special powers of attorney, hereinafter referred to as the lessor of the one part and dig (hp) itb police hereinafter referred to as the lessee of the other part.and whereas the lessee (party no. 2) has followed the laid down covenants and conditions, the lessee .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1999 (TRI)

All India Esi Corporation Vs. Director General, Esi

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... open competitive examination in the case of css stenographers has been examined by various benches of the tribunal when the applicants belonging to central administrative tribunal, bsf, indo-tibetan border security force and bureau of police research and development wanted parity with csss. this is so when there is no provision for direct recruitment to the post of assistant in bsf and cat. the ..... recruitment.11. we also find that the revised pay scale of 1640-2900 has been granted to similarly placed persons in attached and subordinate offices like cbi. central administrative tribunal, border security ordnance factory board employees, crime-assistants in cbi and assistants in the subordinate offices of directorate general of income tax (inv): offices of the cbtd, ministry of finance.12 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2018 (HC)

Neeraj Kumar vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... over thirty days, without permission or leave from the competent authority, a judicial enquiry committee was constituted on 15.10.2014, under section 74(1) of the indo-tibetan border police act, 1992. the judicial enquiry committee declared the petitioner as a deserter due to his absence w.e.f. 27.09.2014 and recommended that disciplinary action ..... respondents explaining the reasons of his absence. due to the persistent absence of the petitioner, the respondents addressed a letter dated 27.10.2014 to the superintendent of police, district bhiwani, haryana informing about his absence and requested that he be arrested and handed over to the itbp at gautum budh nagar, u.p. it ..... for the petitioner within the camp premises. when he could not be found, an absent report of the petitioner from the camp was registered with the local police station greater noida, u.p. vide letter dated 27.09.2014.4. the petitioner continued remaining absent thereafter due to which memorandums dated 14.10.2014, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (HC)

Shri Rajendra Prasad & Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... his previous job with the rajasthan state road transport corporation. his services were confirmed on 28th august, 1982. 4.3 with effect from 1st september, 1992 the indo-tibetan border police act, 1992 ( itbp act ) came into force. section 157 (2) of the itbp act stated that all members of the itbp in existence as of ..... :31. t january, 2019 w.p.(c) 1951/2012 + dev sharma ...petitioner through: mr. ankur chhibber with mr. aditya chhibber and mr. bhanu gupta, advocates. versus ...respondents indo tibetan border police & anr. through: mr. manish mohan, cgsc for uoi with ms. manisha saroha, advocates. + ranbir singh saini and anr. w.p.(c) 389/2013 ...petitioners through: mr. ..... at par with the officers above the rank of commandant. the three capfs in question are the indo-tibetan border police ( itbp ), the central reserve w.p.(c) 1951/2012 and batch matters page 16 of 70 police force (crpf) and the border security force (bsf).2. there are 19 petitions in the present batch. 8 petitions pertain .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //