Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 preamble 1 indo tibetan border police force act 1992 Court: orissa Page 1 of about 15 results (0.104 seconds)

Sep 26 2007 (HC)

Rabindranath Mishra Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2008Ori19

..... other armed forces of the union.13. the crpf is one of the armed forces of the union like bsf, cisf, assam rifles, indo-tibetan border security force, s.s. b. security force and rapid action force. in this regard, section 3 of the c.r.p.f. ..... in view of the above discussion, we have no doubt in our mind that the central reserve police force is an armed force of the union like border security force and the cisf.17. now we come to the provision of reservation made in paragraph ..... of the force-(1) there shall continue to be an armed force maintained by the central government and called the central reserve police force.(2) the force shall be constituted in such manner, and the members of the force ghaty receive such pay, pension and ..... action (ii) permanently disabled in action and (iii) serving.11. now the first question arises as to whether the central reserve police force of which the petitioner is a member would come under armed forces or paramilitary forces. in this regard, it is necessary to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 1992 (HC)

Banka Das, Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1993CriLJ442; 1992(II)OLR395

..... giving priority only to the interest of the nation and the security of the state. it is undoubtedly true that in our eastern and north-eastern borders there are some unfriendly foreign powers which, with evil and hostile designs, are constantly seducing political adventurisms and gullible inhabitants of that area and aiding ..... and law enforcement in view of the intolerable alternatives which are possible. if the officer has unrestrained authority to ignore persona! liberties, the product is a police state: if he is barred from any interference with private rights, the result is criminal anarchy. in order to avert these ative perils and their intermediate ..... under reference would not ipso facto be fatal to the prosecution. these provisions are intended to rule out the possibility of haphazard attempts by the police official against unmerited prosecutions. any deficiency in the collection of materials cannot affect the trial and conviction unless prejudice or failure of justice is the resultant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1992 (HC)

Banka Das, Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 75(1993)CLT225; 1992(I)OLR421

..... and then proceed with the trial. therefore, an excise official investigating into an offence under the act cannot be held to be a police officer nor the report submitted by him can be equated with a report submitted under section 173 cr. p. c. the question whether an excise officer having invested ..... authorised in this behalf can take cognizance of that offence without the accused being committed to it for trial. thus it contemplates submission of a report by the police or a complaint by an officer of the central government or state government authorised in this behalf on the basis of which the special court can take cognizance ..... referred these cases to a division bench. the learned single judge has formulated four questions:(1) whether an excise official investigating into an offence under the act is a police officer empowered to file a charge sheet or he is required to file a complaint under section 190 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (in short 'the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2010 (HC)

GeomIn Minerals and Marketing (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

1. The petitioner, Geomin Minerals & Marketing (P) Ltd. which is a Company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, has filed this writ petition, inter alia with the following prayers:"Order the opposite parties to dispose of all pending applications for Mineral Concessions filed by the petitioner and set out in the petition in accordance with its vested right to preferential consideration in view of the fact that the petitioner's applications have been filed on the first date of availability and eligibility.Issue a writ of prohibition or any other appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the opposite parties from considering applications for Mineral Concessions of later applicants to the petitioner until the applications of the petitioner are first considered and disposed of by according priority or preferential right based on the petitioner being a first day applicant having applied for the concerned Mineral Concessions set out in the petition on the first date of a...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1998 (HC)

Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 85(1998)CLT560; (1999)158CTR(Ori)298; [1999]235ITR574(Orissa)

Susanta Chatterji, J.1. Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys Ltd., a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, having its registered office at Bomikhal, Bhubaneswar, now in the district of Khurda, Orissa, has filed the present writ petition praying inter alia :'Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances the petitioner prays this court to be pleased to : (a) issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ and/or direction against opposite parties and to certify and send up to this court all papers and documents in connection with the passing of annexure-1 so that they can be examined and if so considered be quashed ;(b) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction quashing annexure-1 and para. 7 of the guidelines in annexure-3 ;(c) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus against opposite party No. 1, Central Government, directing them to issue a declaration forthwith or within such time, as the petitioner has satisfied all t...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1998 (HC)

Prachi Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1998Ori209

..... set up and goes into commercial production during the period in which the policy is in force, there is no justification for the government to deny the benefits under the police even though capital investment might have made prior to the effective date. 9. no doubt, neither the 1986 i.p.r. nor the 1989 i.p.r. defines as to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 1992 (HC)

Bijayalaxmi Tripathy and Ors. Vs. the Managing Committee of Working Wo ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1992Ori242; 74(1992)CLT927

..... petitioners a copy of which has been enclosed as annexure-1 to the writ petition. as the petitioners did not vacate despite this notice, police help was sought to evict them from the rooms but as the police did not turn up, the five petitioners were evicted from the rooms at 3 p.m. of 17th and their rooms were locked.43 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2005 (HC)

Pragnya Rout Vs. Hemaprava Ray and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2006Ori21; 100(2005)CLT746; 2005(II)OLR330

..... information lodged by the tenants. in the year 1996 defendant no. 4 again threatened the tenants and coerced them to vacate the shop-rooms which fact was also reported to police by filing firs. finally on 28th june, 1996 defendant no. 4 and his anti-social associates forcibly broke open the aforesaid shop-rooms at night, ransacked the same ..... defendant nos. 6 to 11 in respect of the suit land described in schedule-a of the plaint be declared. possession of the six shop rooms standing on the eastern border of the suit plot be delivered to the plaintiff and pro forma defendants 6 to 11 by evicting defendant nos. 1 to 5 and the plaintiffs' possession of (sic ..... rooms constructed on the disputed land much prior to the date when the litigation started and exts.31 to 37- the case diaries and firs lodged at the mangalabag police station of cuttack during the period from 1993 to 1996 alleging that defendant no. 4 was trying to forcibly enter into the disputed land, unerringly lead to the conclusion .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1995 (HC)

State Vs. Bharat Chandra Roul

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2417

ORDERA. Pasayat, J.1. Alleging commission of criminal misconduct as set out in Section 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short, the 'Act'), prosecution has sought for action against Shri Bharat Chandra Roul, (hereinafter: referred to as the 'accused'), a public servant. It is alleged that he is guilty of offence punishable under Section 13(2) of the Act read with Section 8(3), of the Orissa Special Courts Act, 1990 (in short, the 'Special Act').2. Section 13, deals with various situations when a public servant can be said to have committed criminal misconduct. Clause (c) of Sub-section (1) of the section is pressed into service against the accused. The same is applicable when the public servant or any person on his behalf, is in possession or has, at any stime during the period of his office, been in possession for which the public servant cannot satisfactorily account of pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to his known sources of income. Clause (e) of Sub-secti...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 1999 (HC)

Dhruba Charan Panda and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 88(1999)CLT637; 1999(II)OLR433

A. Pasayat, Acting C.J.1. A question of universal importance revolving round the role of employer, more particularly the State Government to grant 'pension' to its retired employees is involved in this case. Several learned counsel assisted the Court in this case without any particular reference to background facts of the case at hand. The problem is of wide amplitude and grievances factually are more or less the same. After rendering years of service the employer finds from records that the employee has reached a particular age and he should retire. Immediate consequence of these is reduction in the payment made to him by the employer. Thereafter what the employee gets is normally called pension. Factual matrix as indicated above only assists in dealing with broader issues involved.2. A political society which has a goal of setting up of a welfare State, would introduce and has in fact introduced as a welfare measure wherein the retiral benefit is grounded on consideration of State ob...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //