Individual - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Modu Timblo (individual)

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1994)116CTR(Bom)442; [1994]206ITR647(Bom)

firms and interest earned on bank accounts have to be assessed in the hands of the 'body of individuals' consisting of Mr. and Mrs. Modu Timblo (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the

Subhash Gupta (individual) Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Reported in: (2003)78TTJ(JP.)692

facts of the case are that the assessee derives income from export of garments in the status of individual. The return of income was filed on 29th Oct., 1997, along with audit report under Section 44AB declaring

Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Gujarat-ii, Ahmedabad Vs. Arvind Narottam ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC1824; (1988)72CTR(SC)94; [1988]173ITR479(SC); JT1988(3)SC423; 1988(2)SCALE401; (1988)4SCC113a; [1988]Supp2SCR266

the like manner and to the same extent as it would be leviable upon and recoverable from an individual who is a citizen of India and resident in India) for the purpose of this Act.6. The contention

Dy. Cit Vs. Satya Prakash (individual) and (Huf)

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2004)91TTJ(Del)90

Matched in: Parties Dy. Cit Vs. Satya Prakash (individual) and (Huf)

Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai and Another Vs. K. Sundaramoorthy ...

Court: Chennai

notices, the assessee filed a return in HUF status and did not choose to file return in his individual status. The assessment was completed under Section 158BC read with Section 144, in the hands of the assessee

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Vijaipat Singhania (individual) and Vee ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1991]192ITR308(All)

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Vijaipat Singhania (individual) and Veena Devi Singhania (individual)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Palace Fund (individual)

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1992]196ITR505(Ker)

the notional income from the property in the hands of the Palace Fund in the status of an individual for the assessment years 1967-68 to 1971-72. In I. T. R. Nos. 172 to 176 of 1982, we

Wealth-tax Officer Vs. Niranjan Narottam (individual)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1985)14ITD27(Ahd.)

1. The common issue in all these appeals relates to the valuation of properties. Taking the first and second appeals, the WTO valued a bunglow called 'Shalimar' situated in Shahi Baug, Ahmedabad, for wealth-tax purposes at...

Consortium of Corporate & Individual Aided Educational Agencies of Ker ...

Court: Kerala

BASANT BALAJI WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 18TH SRAVANA, 1945 PETITIONER/S:1 CONSORTIUM OF CORPORATE & INDIVIDUAL AIDED EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES OF KERALA HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT TC 82/413-ARA 93, ATHANI ROAD, VANCHIYOOR THIRUVANTHAPURAM-PIN 695035 REPRESENTED

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. P.D. Singhania (individual)

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2006)206CTR(All)529; [2006]287ITR19(All)

and 1979-80.3. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows:4. The assessee, an individual was living in the house owned by him. The Income-tax Officer, however did not accept the claim of