Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Indices - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial to open GPT-powered briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results — plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 05 2015

M/s. Indication Instruments Limited Vs. Anita Kumari and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Oct-05-2015

1. Dispute as to termination arose on January 06, 2011 when the services of respondent-Anita Kumari were illegally terminated by...


Mar 04 1895

National Cash Register Co. Vs. Boston Indicator Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-04-1895

National Cash Register Co. v. Boston Indicator Co. - 156 U.S. 502 (1895) U.S. Supreme Court National


Mar 02 2013

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That Although No Indicated Off ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-02-2013

Court on 18.2.2013:- “Learned counsel, inter-alia, contended that although no indicated offences CRM not M-5460 of 2013 (O&M) 2 are made


Turn these results into brief-ready notes

Jul 18 2014

“10. What Cannot Possibly Be Disputed Here Is That the Indicated Nar ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-18-2014

under:-“10. What cannot possibly be disputed here is that the indicated Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances and controlled salt, recovered from the


Jun 19 2013

Boehringer Ingelheim International Gmbh Vs. the Controller of Patents ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Jun-19-2013

(Circuit Bench At Delhi) Order (No. 130 of 2013) D.P.S. Parmar Technical Member (Patents) The appellant is aggrieved by the...


Apr 05 2013

Sugen Inc.and Another Vs. Controller General of Patents, Design, Trade ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Apr-05-2013

Before we heard the counsel for both the parties, we indicated to the counsel that it was in the interest of


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial