Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Court: delhi Page 5 of about 10,415 results (0.174 seconds)

Federation of Okhla Industrial Association (Regd.) vs.lt Governor of D ...

Court : Delhi

..... rail corporation (dmrc) had disputed liability to pay property tax in view of section 184 of the railways act. this judgment notes that the delhi metro rail corporation limited is a company registered under section 617 of the companies act, 1956 and that the central government and the government of nct of delhi having 50% holding ..... acting according to reason or judgment, depending on the will alone. (emphasis supplied) 361. it is also a well settled principle that exercise of power will be set aside if there is a manifest error in the exercise of such power or the exercise of the power is manifestly arbitrary. [ref: (2003) 4 scc579(para 13), indian railway construction company ..... of 218 w.p.(c)no.5217/17. the petitioner nos.2 to 8 in this writ petition are either companies incorporated under the provisions of the companies act or societies under the society registration act, all of whom claim that they are either running hospitals or providing medical facilities.6. all other connected writ .....

M/S Stelling Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (railyatri.in) and Anr. Vs.indian ...

Court : Delhi

..... retail ticketing and other allied travel, tourism and ticketing products in transport sector. the expertise developed in this area will be useful for indian railways and can be marketed to other railway systems world over and any other transport companies like bus companies or airlines, etc. and whereas the irctc will provide quality services and take marketing initiatives to raise revenues have reached an understanding ..... through psps ids will only be counted for penal action against psps iii) the complaints arising out of bookings made through personal ids will be taken up through rpf under railway act for touting activity. such complaints for tickets booked on personal id will not be counted for the purpose of the suspending psps on criteria number of complaints. of ii) irregularities .....

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and

Court : Delhi

Reported in : II(2007)ACC23; 140(2007)DLT571

..... of companies act and whether smt. nishi saigal was not authorised to file this claim application, as contended3. whether the respondents prove that the wagon with no. er-78436 was not lost in transit and not decanted, if so, the effects thereof.4. to what relief, if any, the applicant is entitled.3. railway claims ..... harender singh, executive director and constituted general attorney, indian oil corporation limited, new delhi. this documentary evidence puts the case of the appellant in an impregnable position. the case pertaining to nishi saigal and b.s ..... i, the said narender singh, executive director and duly constituted attorney of the corporation, am desirous of appointing shri g.d. minocha, dy. manager (law), indian oil corporation ltd., delhi and haryana state office, new delhi, as my attorney and as the attorney of the said corporation.this power of attorney was executed by .....

Cox and Kings India Ltd. Vs. India Railway Catering and Tourism Corp. ...

Court : Delhi

..... the agreement. 6. in the said agreement, it was also recorded that pursuant to the permission given by indian railways to the respondent to own and operate the luxury tourist train consisting of approximately 23 coaches, the joint venture company was formed. 7. some of the relevant clauses of the joint venture agreement are as follows: "article ..... april, 2012 , the arrangement which was continued, be maintained subject to any terms and conditions granted by the court. 19. the petitioner submits that the act of termination by letter dated 12.08.2011 by the respondent would put the huge investment made by the petitioner into jeopardy and the goodwill and reputation would ..... the last non-contested status which preceded the pending controversy until the final hearing when full relief may be granted or to compel the undoing of those acts that have been illegally done or the restoration of that which was wrongfully taken from the party complaining. but since the granting of such an injunction .....

Holland Company Lp and anr Vs. S.P. Industries

Court : Delhi

..... ; (xiv) that the plaintiffs drawings of the spare parts of automatic twist lock devices are readily available as it is a public document published by the indian railways with due permission of the plaintiffs; (xv) that the defendant has copied the drawings of the plaintiff no.1 for manufacture of spare parts of automatic ..... manufacturing, selling, offering for sale automatic twist locks and parts thereof by using the industrial drawings, designs, specifications and product information supplied by the plaintiffs to the indian railways; and, (iii) for ancillary relief for delivery of infringing products.2. the plaint was accompanied with this application claiming the same interim relief as in the ..... spare parts by the defendant to the railways is to be as per the specifications given by the railways. referring to section 22 of the copyright act it was also argued that since the same refers to the death of the author, the copyright cannot be held by a company. distinction was also sought to be .....

Holland l.p. & Anr vs.a.d. Electro Stell Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... of the suit (2014), no other supplier except the plaintiff has been approved by defendants no.2 & 3/indian railway for the supply of atls. cs(comm) no.83/2017 page 4 of 26 6 defendant no.1 (a.d. electro steel company pvt. ltd.) is engaged in the manufacture and supply of container securement locks. defendant no.1 is not ..... it is reiterated that the plaintiffs original proprietary drawings of atls and its spare parts constitute an artistic work under section 13 read with section 2 (c) of the copyright act. the unauthorized, illegal and cs(comm) no.83/2017 page 6 of 26 unlicensed use of such proprietary drawings of the plaintiffs amounts to an infringement of his copyright ..... including its drawings as has been alleged by him. the claim of plaintiff no.1 is barred under the design act and the patent act as the said drawings have been provided by defendant no.2 to the ministry of railways for public purpose. the drawings prepared by defendant no.1 are from the drawings provided by defendant no.2 .....

Indian Railway Stations Development Corporation Ltd. Vs.pr. Commission ...

Court : Delhi

..... items of expenditure claimed as deduction, i.e., depreciation, preliminary expenses, and employees remuneration.2. the assessee/petitioner company was incorporated under the old companies act on 12.04.2012 as a joint venture company of indian railway construction company ltd. (ircon) and rail land development authority (rlda); these two entities held equity shareholding in the proportion of ..... , i.e., preparation of development plans and projects for the development of railway stations. the indian railways apparently conceived the idea of setting up the petitioner as a special purpose vehicle to re-develop its railway stations. each of the railway stations, therefore, as part of its plan needs to be bid for separately ..... $~20 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi decided on:26. h march, 2019. + w.p.(c) 6782/2018 indian railway stations development corporation ltd. ........ petitioner through: mr. g.c. srivastava & mr. suvinay kumar dash, advs. versus pr. commissioner of income tax-iv ..... .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi Vs. Hindustan General Industries Ltd ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1981)23CTR(Del)73; [1982]137ITR851(Delhi)

..... corporation. it is hoped that after the receipt of loan or by making some other alternate arrangement the remaining work will be completed and very shortly the company will start the manufacture of railway goods wagons.' 7. the directors report for the ending 30th june, 1959 was dated 4th march, 1960. it stated : 'as reported to you last ..... the assessed had obtained a license under the factories act in 1950. the manufacture of the various items was was being in a factory situated at nabi karim, qutab road, delhi. 5. in august, 1957, the ministry of railways of the govt. of india placed an order with the assessed-company for the manufacture and supply of 100 broad-gauge ..... to him the company had started the manufacturing operations in the factory at nangoli given in the accounting year which ended on 30th june, 1960, relevant to the assessment year 1961-62. for that year, the assessed's claim had to be considered under s. 15c of the indian i.t. act, 1922. under that act the benefit of s .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi, New Delhi Vs. State Trading Corpora ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi666; [1973]92ITR294(Delhi)

..... scheme? to relieve un-employment. it was held that this was not a receipt which had anything to do with trade.''inpretoria-pietersburg railway company ltd. v. elwood, 6 tax cas. 508. a railway company had constructed a railway under a concession granted by the government of the south african republic. after the war of 1901-3, the ..... government did so afterpayment of the share capital and after taking over the obligation of the south african republic to pay guaranteed interest on share capital. the railway company did not operate during the period of the war and the question arose, whether the guaranteed amount, paid for that period as interest on share capital was ..... the accounting year in which the amount in question was sanctioned in favor of the assessed company. however, the income-tax officer has expressly pointed out that no trading activity was earned on till 1st july, 1966. the indian income-tax act, 1922, in section 10(1) provides:- 'thetax shall be payable by an assessed under .....

National Buildings Construction Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Antia Electricals Pvt. ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003(3)ARBLR91(Delhi); 2003(2)RAJ258

..... petitioner which is a public sector company incorporated under the indian companies act succeeded in getting a contract 'for construction of industrial building and main station of baghdad ai-qaim akashat railway project' (hereinafter to be referred as 'main contract' for short) from iraqi government company, called the state company for contracts of industrial projects (sccip ..... the dispute in the present case related to different contract altogether which was a railway project and the agreement was dated 28.09.1982. it was, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, in act under mistake was not binding on the petitioner and the appointment of the arbitrator ..... the circumstances, following the supreme court judgments in engineering mazdoor sabha v. hind cycles (supra), rohtas industries v. its union (supra) and associated cement companies limited v. p.n. sharma (supra), this court holds that revision under article 227 is not maintainable as against the orders of rejection of memo .....