Indian Electricity Act - Judgment Search Results

Abhishek Kumar Son of Dr. Dipak Kumar Sharma and ors. Vs. the Bihar St ...

Court: Patna

dated 22.12.2008 (Annexure-9), passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 16819 of 2008 (Prabhat Kumar v. Bihar State Electricity Board and Ors.), may be reheard and reviewed, inter alia, on the ground they were not parties to … following extract from the advertisement would be helpful.S. No.Name of the Post Pay ScaleTotal No. of PostCategory & Code  UR 1SC 2ST 3EBC 4BC 5Female (BC)* 61Assistant Electrical Engineer (General Cadre)7850-275-10050-300-136501336721124164 Assistant Executive Engineer (GTO Cadre)8125-275-10050-300-136503920617412(Electrical / Electronics)Assistant Executive … Literacy Test has been notified.4. While assailing the validity of the impugned action, learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petitioners were

Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and Another Vs. Appellate Authorit ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of 2011 DATE OF DECISION:20. 05.2013 Punjab State Power Corporation LTD.& another ....Petitioners Versus Appellate Authority under the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 Cum- A.D.C Ludhiana and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr.S.C.Pathela, Advocate, for the … of the order dated 09.06.2010 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner-cum- Appellate Authority designated under the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, whereby the appeal preferred by respondent No.2 has been accepted and the final assessment order dated 9.7.2009

Shri Jaysing Rangarao Raut Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Board a S ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(1)ALLMR248; 2004(6)BomCR641; 2004(4)MhLj115

deprived of the difference in salary for no fault of his. Mr. Adik submitted that the Maharashtra State Electricity Board has famed regulation in exercise of powers conferred by Section 79(c) of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 … with the 1st respondent. Sometime in or about 1967, the petitioner was prosecuted both under the Criminal Procedure Code and also was subjected to departmental enquiry on the charge that the petitioner has participated in an illegal