Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 10 amendment of section 9 Sorted by: old Year: 2009 Page 3 of about 1,861 results (0.437 seconds)

Tirupur Lorry Urimaiyalargal Sangam Rep. by Its President, C.N. Ramasa ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ1081

..... therefore, without availing such remedy, this court cannot entertain the writ petition.11. subsequent to the judgement, section 34-a was introduced by amending act (tamil nadu act 25/2003). it is also brought to the notice of this court by mr. t. chandrasekaran, learned special government pleader for the respondent- ..... hindu religious and charitable endowments department that when section 34-a was introduced by the tamil nadu act 25 of 2003. the amendment also provided for an internal safeguard for any person aggrieved and that section 34-a(3) reads as follows:-section 34-a(3): any person ..... in one of the writ petitions as rental amount which is disputed by the petitioner sangam. the petitioner sangam is a society registered under the societies registration act. it is stated that the society was constituted for the purpose of transporting essential commodities to the market and other places having public access apart from .....

Dkg Buildcon Private Limited Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry Officer, ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... deterrent. this provision was amended with effect from 29.10.2002 to provide for a penalty of one lac rupees for each day during which such ..... rs.1.5 lacs. section 15a(a) of the act finds mention in chapter via of the act which was introduced in january 1995. the provision as it originally stood provided for a penalty not exceeding rs.1,50,000 for each such failure. this provision was amended by the amending act of 2002 which was meant to make the penalty more ..... cases before us the summons which were not complied with had been issued in april 2003 and, therefore, the penalty was levied in accordance with the amended provisions of section 15a(a) of the act at the enhanced rate. that order of the tribunal does not advance the case the appellants. for the reasons recorded above, the appeals fail and .....

Bachan Singh and ors. Vs. the District Development and Panchayat Offic ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)154PLR94

..... the damage of rs. 7,20,000/- are challenged.2. gram panchayat, respondent, filed an application under section 5 of the punjab public premises and land (eviction and rent recovery) act, 197s for eviction of nand singh, father of the petitioners. the district development and panchayat officer, amritsar, ordered the ejectment of father of the petitioners on 25.3.1983. the .....

Delux Enterprisers Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)21VST258(P& H)

..... and taxation commissioner/deputy excise and taxation commissioner are well based and do not warrant any interference of this court. even otherwise under section 68(3) and (4) of the act no appeal can be entertained for determination of findings of fact. such an appeal could only be on the basis of substantial question of law as contemplated by section 68 ..... m.m. kumar, j. 1. this is an assessee's appeal filed under section 68(2) of the punjab value added tax act, 2005 (for brevity 'the act') challenging the order dated october 22, 2007 passed by the value added tax tribunal, punjab (for brevity 'the tribunal') in appeal no. 275 of 2006-07.2. the facts are ..... (3) and (4) of the act which in fact does not arise in the present case. a perusal of section 68(4) of the act shows that the appeal could be heard only on a substantial question contemplated by section 68(3) of the .....

Basant Ram Vs. Siri Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... dress trial, the learned trial court acquitted the respondents for the offences punishable under section 7 of the protection of civil rights act, 1955 and under sections 323,504 read with section 34 of the indian penal code.2. the acquittal of the respondents has been challenged by the appellant in this appeal on the grounds that the ..... preliminary evidence, respondents no. 1 and 2 were charge-sheeted for the offences punishable under sections 504, 323 read with section 34 of the indian penal code and section 7 of the protection of civil rights act, 1955 whereas respondent no. 3 was charge-sheeted for the offence punishable under section 323 read with section 34 of the ..... indian penal code.8. respondents did not plead guilty to the charges and claimed trial. they were also examined under section 313 of the code of .....

P.C. Hawaladaar Vs. Jogen Das and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2009MP129

..... only this much is required to be seen that the application is bona fide or not. thus, according to us, learned trial court has acted illegally in rejecting the application of amendment filed by plaintiff. according to us, merely on the ground of delay in the present facts and circumstances of the case, the application should ..... , during the pendency of civil suit, as alleged by plaintiff, the patta of the suit property has been granted to defendants by the state government, therefore, the proposed amendment is based on subsequent events, and, therefore ..... in the amendment application, it is revealed that during pendency of the suit defendant no. 1 has become title holder as stated by the plaintiff and, therefore, in view of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the specific relief act, the plaintiff has a right to ask for specific performance of contract. since .....

Himachal Road Transport Corporation Retired Employees Union Vs. Himach ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(1)ShimLC310

..... (conditions of service) amendment act, 1986.' a similar provision which made the amendment by act 35 of 1976 applicable only to those judges who have retired on or after october 1, 1974 was held idtra vires and struck down ..... not be denied the benefit of liberalized pension scheme. their lordships have held as under:at this stage itself, we may note that this amending act 38 of 1986 provided that the amended liberalised pension scheme would apply only to a judge 'who has retired on or after the commencement of the high court and supreme court judges ..... oil company limited and the burmah oil company (india trading) limited act, 1981.in our view, the ratio of the aforesaid judgment is not applicable in the present case. in the said case, indian oxygen ltd. had set up a 'non-contributory superannuation fund' known as the indian oxygen ltd. executive staff pension fund. as per the rules, .....

Harpreet Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)153PLR430

..... (p-8) to the show cause notice dated 12.12.2006. in view of issuance of fresh show cause notice dated 12.12.2006, the petitioner has also amended the writ petition enabling him to challenge the same.8. in the written statement filed by respondent nos. 2 and 3 the stand taken is that the instant petitioner ..... to raise construction in the prescribed or the extended period shall make the allotment liable for cancellation for violation of terms and conditions of allotment as provided in the act and the rules.b) for commercial plots:- the extension in the period for raising construction on commercial plots shall be permitted on the pattern/terms and conditions ..... and development of urban estates. the division bench judgment in tehal singh's case (supra) examined section 2(zc), 43, 148, 180 and 183 of the 1995 act and noticed that the punjab urban development authority (puda) was established by the state of punjab by issuing notification dated 30.6.1995 by abolishing the punjab housing development .....

Raunaq Ram Vs. Gopal Dass and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)3PLR723

K. Kannan, J.1. The tenant, who has been evicted on the twin consideration of subletting and dilapidated condition of the building before both the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority, is the revision petitioner before this Court.2. The counsel for the revision petitioner addressed the argument that the landlord had not examined himself but he had examined only his power of attorney, who was not competent to give such evidence and consequently there was no material on the basis of which eviction could have been awarded. When it was pointed out to him that such a wide proposition could not be countenanced for the petitioner, that landlord was the master of his own case and it was open to him to place such evidence as he deemed proper and the evidence of power of attorney cannot be rejected any more than an inference that was possible, that if he had been examined he would have been forced to admit some material facts, the landlord himself must have been examined and he was evadin...

State of Punjab and anr. Vs. City Petro

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)21VST353(P& H)

..... respondent filed further appeal before the tribunal under section 63 of the vat act. the tribunal has accepted the claim made by the respondent vide its order dated april 11, 2008 (a5). the operative part of the order passed by the tribunal ..... march 31, 2005 by recording a finding that it was filed after a period of 45 days. the appeal filed by the respondent under section 62 of the vat act against the order of the designated officer was dismissed on march 29, 2007 by the appellate authority (a4). against the order of the first appellate authority, the ..... officer on august 17, 2005, who rejected the claim on the ground of delay (a1).5. the respondent filed an appeal under section 62(1) of the vat act before the deputy excise and taxation commissioner (appeals), jalandhar division, jalandhar. the appellate authority vide his order dated march 31, 2006, set aside the order of the designated .....