Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 10 amendment of section 9 Sorted by: old Year: 2009 Page 8 of about 1,861 results (1.545 seconds)

Jan 16 2009 (HC)

Jitendra Yadav and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-16-2009

Reported in : AIR2009MP92

..... election scheduled to be held after 40 days from the original date of election as null and void because such declaration would be contrary to the object of the act as discussed above, namely the early elections to the vacancies in the offices of elected members of the board for ensuring a democratic cantonment administration.8. mr. ..... government of india, ministry of defence, new delhi, issued another notification dated 3rd october, 2008 under sub-section (1) of section 15 of the act read with rule 20 of the cantonment electoral rules, 2007, (for short 'the rules') fixing 14th december, 2008 to be the date on which elections to the cantonment ..... dated 10th september, 2008 issued by the government of india, ministry of defence, new delhi, under sub-section (1) of section 15 of the cantonments act, 2006 (for short 'the act'), 9th november 2008 was fixed as the date on which the elections to the cantonment boards of jabalpur, saugor and mhow shall be held. thereafter, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2009 (HC)

Dolat Electric Corporation and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-19-2009

Reported in : (2009)25VST352(NULL)

..... 72.23 7223.00 wire of stainless steel rs. 2,500 per tonne-----------------------------------------------------------------------------para 15. the supreme court, while considering section 14(iv) of the central sales tax act, before amendment, dealing with iron and steel, in state of tamil nadu v. pyare lal malhotra reported in : [1976] 37 stc 319 (sc), observed as follows:what we ..... a cycle was a part of the wheel and hence fell under sub-item (xiv) of item (iv) of section 14 of the 1956 act.(b) in the case of indian metals and ferro alloys ltd. v. collector of central excise : air 1991 sc 1028, the supreme court held that poles supplied to telephone ..... authority and further relied physical and chemical composition and characteristics of the said goods, glossary of terms relating to iron and steel published by the bureau of indian standards and various isi specifications and other literature to show that the said goods were stainless steel wire irrespective of its being used, inter alia, for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2009 (TRI)

Multiplex Association of India C/O Federation of Indian Chambers of Co ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jan-19-2009

..... to ht-2 with effect from the date on which a new tariff order came into effect. the present appellant is an association of multiplexes set up by the indian chamber of commerce and industry. they are hit by the main tariff order in which the msm were put into a new category, lt-ix. by the ..... rel is arrayed as respondent no.2 in this appeal. it filed its arr and tariff petition before the commission under section 61 and 62 of the electricity act 2003 (the act for short) on which the commission held a technical validation session and thereafter issued public notices before passing the impugned order. vide the impugned order, the commission ..... for the purpose of recovering tariff from the msm and challenges creation of this category on the ground that the same is in violation of the provisions of the act, the maharashtra electricity regulatory commission (terms and conditions of tariff) regulations 2005 (regulations for short) and national tariff policy. it is contended that the commission is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2009 (HC)

Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-19-2009

Reported in : AIR2009Ori124; 107(2009)CLT430

..... amount by applying the new rate of rs. 200 as per annexure-2 dated 2.2.1995. it is submitted that the parent act of 1959 as well as the impugned amending act, 1993 (act 3 of 1994) are in applicable to mining establishment of the petitioner for the reasons elaborated hereinafter in the grounds of the writ petition ..... agreement with state under annexure-1 to the writ petition, no details of such alleged compelling circumstances nor coercion has been stated in the writ petition. in indian contract act, 1872 the term 'coercion' has defined under section 15 and in the event a contract has been obtained by coercion, such contract is 'voidable' at the ..... contended that since the use of water in mining operation was also covered by another central act namely, water (prevention & control of pollution cess) act, 1977 as well the petitioner claimed to have an indefeasible riparian legal right under indian easement act, 1882. it is also submitted that river karo from which water has been drawn by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2009 (HC)

Dr. Arvind Vs. Mannalal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-19-2009

Reported in : 2009(4)MPHT197

..... p. purushottam reddy and anr. v. pratap steels ltd. : (2002) 2 scc 686, the supreme court has held as under:it was a settled position of law before the 1976 amendment that the court, in an appropriate case could exercise its inherent jurisdiction under section 151, cpc to order a remand if such a remand was considered pre-eminently necessary ex ..... and a retrial is considered necessary. on twin conditions being satisfied, the appellate court can exercise the same power of remand under rule 23a as under rule 23. after the amendment, all the cases of wholesale remand are covered by rules 23 and 23a. in view of the express provisions of these rules, the high court cannot have recourse to its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2009 (HC)

Kaliyambal and Nagaraj Vs. Padmini @ Gandhimathi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-20-2009

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ1300

..... .10. i cannot countenance such an argument in this factual matrix, for the reason, that sub-section (4) of section 4 of the pondicherry civil court amendment act 2005, in my opinion does not fall foul of any constitutional provisions or jurisprudential principles. it is not that we come across such transitional provisions only in the ..... develop his argument to the effect that the sub court is having no jurisdiction to proceed with the case as section 4 of the pondicherry civil court (amendment act 2005) would contemplate that suits of the value of rs. 5 lakhs and below alone could be tried by the sub court whereas the present suit ..... pondicherry civil court amendment act, but in tamil nadu acts as well as in central acts, one could come across such transitional provisions and i need not elaborate on that ; because those provisions are obvious and axiomatic. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2009 (SC)

Jai Singh and ors. Vs. Gurmej Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-20-2009

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW3652; 2009(1)JT550; 109(2010)CLT440(SC); 2009(1)SCALE679; 2009(1)LC370(SC)

..... date of adjudication of the pre-emption suit and the appellate court is not required to take into account or give effect to the substituted section 15 introduced by the amending act. accordingly, second appeal was dismissed.4. learned counsel for the appellants re-iterated the stand taken before the high court and submitted that the ratio of the decision of ..... was selling his 400/3723 share out of the total holding. the high court turned down the plea based on repeal of the right of a co-sharer by the amending act of 1995. it was observed that right of co-sharers has been held to be prospective in operation and does not affect the right of the parties to the ..... effect:(1) whether plaintiff has superior right to pre-empt the land in dispute being co-sharer?(2) whether plaintiff is estopped from filing present suit by his own act and conduct?on both the issues the trial court returned its findings in favour of the pre-emptor holding that he had a superior right of pre-emption and that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2009 (HC)

Mrs. Dosibai Nanabhoy Jeejeebhoy, Represented by (Byram Nanabhoy Jeeje ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-20-2009

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR476; 2009(111)BomLR1014

..... the respondents is saved by the provisions of section 3, sub-section (4) of the cantonment (extension of rent control laws) act of 1957, as amended by act 22 of 1972.it is submitted by mr. shah that the amendment application pressed into service by the appellants is required to be granted and the appellants may be permitted to ..... tenure of the cantonment lands and as per the judgment in the case of secretary of state for india in council v. satish chandra sen reported in lvii indian appeals, all the lands in cantonment were acquired for military purpose but private individuals were allowed to erect houses on various plots, subject to certain restrictions. it ..... admission certificate is nullity. we, therefore, do not find any substance in this appeal. the appeal is accordingly dismissed with costs.36. so far as the amendment application being civil application no. 5207 of 2008 preferred by the appellants herein is concerned, since on merits we found that the plaintiff has failed to prove her .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2009 (HC)

J. Jayalalithaa Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Wealth Tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-20-2009

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3114; (2009)222CTR(Mad)470; [2009]309ITR277(Mad); [2009]179TAXMAN212(Mad)

..... case relating to : [1966]59itr767(sc) (referred to supra) the assessee had filed the return and that case also dealt with the un-amended provisions contained in section 2(m) of the act and therefore the said decision has no relevance to the case on hand; since the order of the appellate authority is no longer in force ..... the aforesaid submissions the learned special public prosecutor submitted that : [1968]69itr864(sc) (h.h. sety parvati baji v. cwt) relates to the construction of the un-amended section 2(m) and further in that case the assessee had filed the return and therefore the said decision is not applicable to the facts of this case because in ..... net wealth of the assessee would have become in the negative and the question of prosecuting the assessee would not have arisen. it is further contended that even the amendment to section 2(m) does not exclude the debt owed. learned senior counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the rectification of an assessment must be treated on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2009 (HC)

Ramesh Chandra and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-20-2009

Reported in : 2009(2)AWC1640

..... it has been stated that smt. gyanwati, the president of mahila kalyan nigam, sister of ajit singh, m. p. and national president of indian lok dal, new delhi wrote a letter to the consolidation commissioner to cancel the notification. the existence of the said letter has not been disputed in ..... 57395 of 2008 relates to the village kuchesar, pargana and tehsil siyana, district bulandshahr which was notified for consolidation proceedings under section- 4 of the act. the consolidation commissioner by the order dated 25th july, 2008 impugned in the present writ petition has dismissed the representation of the petitioners to keep ..... act dated 21st of september, 1995 has been withdrawn.9. in the writ petition, besides impleading the state of u.p., the consolidation commissioner and collector, aligarh, the petitioners have impleaded dr. smt. gyanwati, president, mahila kalyan nigam, aligarh and shri ajit singh son of late chaudhari charan singh, member of parliament and national president of indian .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //