Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 10 amendment of section 9 Sorted by: old Year: 2009 Page 6 of about 1,861 results (0.411 seconds)

Harbhagwant Singh Alias Noopi and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Punjab and Et ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2009CriLJ1659

..... terms, stated that, santokh singh, kuldip singh and manjit singh, took forcible possession of the land in dispute. dl is also a copy of the amended plaint wherein, relief for mandatory injunction for restoration of possession against santokh singh, kuldip singh and gurdeep singh, was sought, by jagir singh. these documents ..... of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (c) under section 307 to undergo rigorous read with section 149 imprisonment for a period of indian penal code four years and to pay a fine of rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three ..... against the rightful owner must be a settled possession extending over a sufficiently long period and acquiesced in by the true owner. a casual act of possession, would not have the effect of interrupting the possession of the rightful owner. the rightful owner may re-enter and reinstate himself .....

Lowenbrau Ag and anr. Vs. JagpIn Breweries Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2009BusLR360(Del); 157(2009)DLT791; LC2009(1)356

..... company that was earlier marketing safety matches under the registered mark 'three stars' but due to government policy was prohibited from selling safety matches in india. the indian company had sought cancellation of the registration of the mark on the ground of non-user. in that context reference was made to english decisions to decide the ..... were enacted to provide for registration and better protection of trade- marks and for prevention of use of fraudulent marks. the act was also passed to amend and consolidate the law relating to trade mark. historically, protection of intellectual property rights in form of trade- mark, etc. is a common law right. the ..... case, the question of prior use can be judged or decided on the basis of user in india alone. indian market is opening up and foreign or multinational brands have moved and/or are likely to move. similarly, indian brands are likely to move out and expand into markets abroad. national and manmade borders and boundaries are gradually .....

Subhash Narasappa Mangrule, Partnership Firm, Vs. Sidramappa Jagdevapp ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR301

..... therefore, once the award is passed, it is executable under c.p.c. there is no dispute as recorded that as per the bombay civil courts act, 1869 (amended act- 1998) the peculiar jurisdiction of court of civil judge, junior division is restricted to one lack rupees. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i ..... petitioners did not comply with the same award therefore, the execution application filed by the respondent against the petitioners (judgment debtors).15. section 20 of the act empowers to take cognizance by the lok adalat, when both the parties jointly make an application indicating their intention to compromise, which covers the proceeding under section ..... am not inclined to dismiss the execution application on that count. it will frustrate the whole object of settlement and the award under the act. the petitioners .....

Oregon Vs. Ice

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the jury traditionally played no part: when a defendant has been tried and convicted of multiple offenses, each involving discrete sentencing prescriptions, does the sixth amendment mandate jury determination of any fact declared necessary to the imposition of consecutive, in lieu of concurrent, sentences? most states continue the common-law tradition: ..... increased ice s quantum of punishment. held: in light of historical practice and the states authority over administration of their criminal justice systems, the sixth amendment does not inhibit states from assigning to judges, rather than to juries, the finding of facts necessary to the imposition of consecutive, rather than concurrent, ..... this case could not have imposed a sentence of consecutive prison terms without making the factual finding that the defendant caused separate harms to the victim by the acts that produced two convictions. see 343 ore. 248, 268, 170 p. 3d 1049, 1060 (2007) (kistler, j., dissenting). there can thus be .....

National Securities Depository Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... if there was any inadequacy, it was incumbent upon the board to have pointed out the same to cdsl and to have advised it to remove the same by amending the bye laws suitably. 17. the only other adverse finding against cdsl is that it failed to verify the infrastructural facilities of the dps. this charge also fails ..... in all cases. for example, the date of approval by reserve bank of india is not necessary in the case of opening of an account by a domestic indian resident and therefore the date field for such approval in such an account would normally have a default entry which should be easily identifiable as such. it was also ..... a depository system in india and creating an efficient market infrastructure that would obviate the risks of paper-based trading and settlement of transactions in securities. the depositories act was enacted in 1996 to provide a statutory framework for the functioning of depositories. nsdl was the countrys first depository to be granted registration by the board .....

Herring Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... had been rescinded. the magistrate judge recommended denying the motion because the arresting officers had acted in a good-faith belief that the warrant was still outstanding. thus, even if there were a fourth amendment violation, there was no reason to believe that application of the exclusionary rule here would ..... powell, j., concurring in part) ( [t]he deterrent value of the exclusionary rule is most likely to be effective when official conduct was flagrantly abusive of fourth amendment rights ). indeed, the abuses that gave rise to the exclusionary rule featured intentional conduct that was patently unconstitutional. in weeks, 232 u. s. 383 , a ..... ca11 2007) (quoting michigan v. tucker , 417 u. s. 433 , 447 (1974)). and it is uncontested here that herring s arrest violated his fourth amendment rights. the sole question presented, therefore, is whether evidence the police obtained through the unlawful search should have been suppressed.[ footnote 1 ] the court holds that suppression .....

Smt. Sulochana Damodhar W/O Sri. Damodhar Vs. the State Transport Auth ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(3)KarLJ409; 2009(4)KCCR2479; 2009(2)AIRKarR506(D.B);

..... of arbitrariness, discrimination or avoidable inconvenience to the holders of permits etc. under the repealed act and to the travelling public would be hypothetical and without force.12.2 section 217-a of the act, inserted by motor vehicles (amendment) act, 2000, reads as follows:217a. renewal of permits, driving licences and registration granted under ..... the motor vehicles act, 1939:notwithstanding the repeal by sub-section (1) of the section 217 of the ..... contested by the appellant, principally on the ground that, the permit granted under the indian motor vehicles act, 1939 (for short 'the old act') are saved under section 217-a of the indian motor vehicles act, 1988 (for short, 'the act') and the two decisions of the hon'ble supreme court in the said cases, are .....

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2009(121)FLR206]; (2009)IILLJ666Del

..... first respondent is directed to modify the reference order and to include the claim of the workmen for reinstatement with full back wages. the said modification/amendment will be done within a period of four weeks from today. the industrial adjudicator shall thereafter proceed with the reference and dispose of the same as ..... to the first respondent - union of india to refer the industrial dispute to the industrial adjudicator.2. the respondent workers had been working with the appellant, indian oil corporation (ioc for short) for more than two decades as safai karamcharies, except for a short period from 19th july 1995 to 20th february, 1996. ..... would result in perpetuating illegalities and in the jettisoning of the scheme of public employment adopted by us while adopting the constitution. the approving of such acts also results in depriving many of their opportunity to compete for public employment. we have, therefore, to consider the question objectively and based on the constitutional .....

Mso Alliance, Industrial Area, Delhi and Others Versus Telecom Regulat ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

..... useful to recapitulate the background for and the salient features of the impugned tariff order. 6. section 2 (k) of the telecom regulatory authority of india act, 1997 as amended by the telecom regulatory authority of india (amendment) act, 2000 defines ' telecommunication service' as follows: telecommunication service means service of any description (including electronic mail, voicemail, data services, audio tex services, video tex services ..... necessary to go into the statutory provisions as well as the background. section 11 (2) of the telecom regulatory authority of india act, 1997 reads as follows: "11. functions of authority -- (1) ... (2) notwithstanding anything contained in the indian telegraph act 1885 (13 of 1885), the authority may, from time to time, by order, notify in the official gazette the rates at which .....

Akha Ram Vs. Lrs. of Ram Sahai and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2009Raj138; RLW2009(3)Raj1919

..... no. 1 was upon the plaintiff and burden of issue no. 5 was upon the defendant. the defendant submitted an application under order 14 rule 5 cpc and prayed for amending of the issue no. 5 and proposed new issue, upon which after hearing both the parties, the trial court observed that issue no. 1 has not been properly framed and ..... the defendant no. 1 and executed the sale deed on 31st july, 1979 and, therefore, the suit on the basis of the rent deed in question is not maintainable. the amended issue no. 1 is only that whether the defendant no. 1 took the house on rent from plaintiffs and defendant no. 2 for a rent of rs. 60/-per month .....