Skip to content


Indecent - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: indecent Page 1 of about 303 results (0.048 seconds)
Jul 24 2013 (HC)

Kumar J. Sujan, Director of M/S Indec Equipment Pvt. Ltd. and Others V ...

Court: Mumbai

s c dharmadhikari j 1 in this writ petition a division bench of this court extensively heard the parties and...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 1996 (FN)

Denver Area Ed. Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... expressive power under our traditional first amendment jurisprudence factors perhaps justifying some restriction on indecent cable programming may all be taken into account without derogating this category of ..... on the liberties of programmers and adult viewers than allowing cable operators to ban indecent programming from access channels altogether when applying strict scrutiny we will not assume .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 28 2009 (FN)

Fcc Vs. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the commission s new enforcement policy and its order finding the broadcasts actionably indecent were neither arbitrary nor capricious first the commission forthrightly acknowledged that its ..... review the decision to include patently offensive fleeting expletives within the definition of indecency the commission s prior enforcement practice unchallenged here already drew distinctions between the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 14 2004 (FN)

Regina Vs. J (Appellant) (on Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal ...

Court: House of Lords

..... to achieve a fair result for defendants by adjusting the sentences imposed on those whose indecent assaults consisted of unlawful sexual intercourse so that they reflected the maximum sentence fixed ..... penalty of two years imprisonment but unlawful sexual intercourse was triable only on indictment whereas indecent assault could be tried summarily no doubt because some of the behaviours covered were .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 03 1978 (FN)

Fcc Vs. Pacifica Foundation

Court: US Supreme Court

..... broadcasting has the most limited first amendment protection among the reasons for specially treating indecent broadcasting is the uniquely pervasive presence that medium of expression occupies in the ..... material coupled with the concerns recognized in ginsberg amply justify special treatment of indecent broadcasting it is appropriate in conclusion to emphasize the narrowness of our holding .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 1997 (FN)

Reno Vs. American Civil Liberties Union

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the arguments in this court referred to possible alternatives such as requiring that indecent material be tagged to facilitate parental control making exceptions for messages with artistic ..... at issue is the constitutionality of two statutory provisions enacted to protect minors from indecent and patently offensive communications on the internet notwithstanding the legitimacy and importance of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 21 2012 (FN)

Fcc Vs. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... forfeitures the second circuit reversed finding the commission s decision to modify its indecency enforcement regime to regulate fleeting expletives arbitrary and capricious this court reversed ..... commission continued to note the important difference between isolated and repeated broadcasts of indecent material see ibid considering variables in determining whether material is patently offensive .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 1989 (FN)

Sable Communications Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... area brought suit in the district court claiming that 223 b s obscenity and indecency provisions were unconstitutional chiefly under the first and fourteenth amendments and seeking an ..... obscene in an emphatically narrow holding the pacifica court concluded that special treatment of indecent broadcasting was justified pacifica is readily distinguishable from this case most obviously because .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 21 1991 (FN)

Barnes Vs. Glen theatre, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and it furthers a substantial governmental interest in protecting societal order and morality public indecency statutes reflect moral disapproval of people appearing in the nude among strangers in ..... s conduct fell within the statutory prohibition justice hunter dissented arguing that a public indecency statute which prohibits nudity in any public place is unconstitutionally overbroad my reasons .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 1962 (FN)

Manual Enterprises, Inc. Vs. Day

Court: US Supreme Court

..... impure obscene salacious pornographic lascivious 1 wanton lewd lustful syn licentious lecherous libidinous salacious indecent not decent specif a unbecoming or unseemly indecorous syn immodest impure gross obscene ..... envelope or outside cover or wrapper of which or postal card upon which indecent lewd lascivious obscene libelous scurrilous or threatening delineations epithets terms or language or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //