Increment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: increment Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.012 seconds)E. Ebenezer Rajakumar (Former Group Director, Computer and Information ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Nov-09-2011
..... scale as per para 2 iii above it does not matter whether the increment is normal increment or stagnation increment the clarification no 5 in the o m dated 29 01 2009 states ..... all cases where a government servant has been granted an increment whether normal annual increment or stagnation increment after january 01 2005 no increment will be allowed on 01 01 2006 at the time .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.D. Khosla Vs. Union of India, Through the Secretary, New Delhi and O ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-29-2011
..... was that the applicants therein were entitled to the additional increment for pension purpose this order of the hyderabad bench ..... accordingly if the applicants satisfy that they had stagnated stagnation increment has to be taken into consideration for the purpose ..... accountant general aande tamil nadu chennai has granted benefits of increments under the 3rd and 4th proviso to similarly circumstances .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.K. Sarojini, Kannur Dist Vs. State of Kerala Rep. by Principal Secre ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
..... reckoned time spent on leave that will not count for normal increment will not be reckoned prior service of government employees in ..... that time spent on leave that will not count for normal increment will not be reckoned prior service of government employees in aided ..... was given provided such period of training is reckoned for normal increments d non stipendiary period of training in cases where the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.G Suresh and Others Vs. Union of India Represented by Its Secretary ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Nov-30-2011
..... on 1st of july will be eligible to be granted the increment the first increment after fixation of pay on 01 01 2006 in the ..... corresponding to regular group d employee including da hra and cca besides increment at the same rate as applicable to group d employee would ..... to get their monthly salary fixed after taking into account the increments already earned by them in the group d pay scale which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSipra Bhattacharya (Lahiri) Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata Appellate
Decided on: Mar-07-2011
..... of the said institution the subsequent of the respondent authorities in stopping the earlier increment on the ground of lack of requisite qualification is not justified and tenable he ..... order it appears that the authorities sought to implement two decisions firstly stopping the early increment with retrospective effect and secondly contemplating the recovery proceeding for an excess payment it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSenthil Kumar M and Others Vs. Union of India Represented by the Secre ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Oct-28-2011
..... 50 was reflected as personal pay to be adjusted against the future increment the pay scale at that time did not contain the element ..... personal pay to the applicant which gets offset as and when annual increments are due b keeping the grade pay at the rate applicable ..... the same could be adjusted within the first or first two annual increments 24 the applicants by making a request for transfer to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNek Raj Bhatt Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2011
..... 2001 however the head master government high school darang has abruptly withheld the sterilization increment of the petitioner in march 2004 without following the principle of natural justice the ..... employees who had undergone sterilization operation before regularization will not be entitled to sterilization increment even from the date of regularization the rule 5 provides the benefit of approved .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRavindra Kumar Sood and anr. Vs. Ntpc and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2011
..... bdquo minor penalties and bdquo major penalties withholding of promotion as well as withholding of increments are two distinct and separate penalties which falls under the head bdquo minor penalties ..... settled that more than one penalty cannot be imposed simultaneously if penalty of withholding of increment is allowed to operate as affecting his promotion it would tantamount to inflicting another .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSaranjit Singh Vs. Director, Employment, Gnct of Delhi and Another
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2011
..... original application is to direct the respondents to release his increments for the aforesaid years so that his subsistence allowance is ..... not be released the respondents are therefore directed to release the increments to the applicant as and when they were due and ..... frs namely 26 53 and 54 they have also submitted that increments have to be granted only after completion of departmental criminal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhagi Rath Vs. H.R.T.C. and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-2011
..... treated as period spent on duty or not the consequential benefits including proficiency step up increment would automatically follow it has been submitted that in the teeth of directions given in ..... petitioner reference has been made for withholding efficiency bar due to departmental proceedings stoppage of increments due to penalties the respondents before the tribunal in oa no 1755 of 1992 had .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial