Increment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: increment Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.023 seconds)Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-07-2003
Reported in: AIR2004Guj124
..... of the constitution of india the defendant union of india is exempted from liability of incremental contribution demanded by the plaintiff in this behalf ultimately the suit was dismissed by judgment ..... appeared and contended that the reasonings and findings of the learned judge that amount of incremental contribution is exempted under article 285 1 of the constitution of india is errorneous unjust .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBal Krishan Sareen Vs. P.O., Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-26-2003
Reported in: (2004)ILLJ1133P& H
..... officer s service regulations 1979 regulations 5 additionthereto to provide for grant of an additional increment for passing eachpart of the caiib examination by officer staff claim from february 1988 ..... held that the expression wages last drawn occurring in section 17b does not include yearly increments and dearness allowance admissible from time to time subsequent to the impugned termination or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOm Parkash and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-30-2003
Reported in: (2003)135PLR276
..... a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant them the benefit of two advance increments on account of higher responsibility at the time of their appointment promotion as centre head ..... directed to refix the pay of the petitioners after grantingthem the benefit of second additional increment the consequential monetary benefitsbe paid to the petitioners within a period of three months from .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.C. Banawala Vs. District Judge and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-23-2003
Reported in: (2003)3GLR1866
..... within the chances and the period specified sub rule 1 his increments shall after the expiry of the specified chances and specified period ..... the chances and the period specified in sub rule 2 his increments shall after the expiry of the specified chances and the specified ..... the chances and the period specified in sub rule 2 his increment shall be withheld till he passes the examination learned counsel .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. H.S. Srinivas Prasad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT
Decided on: Apr-16-2003
Reported in: (2004)(1)SLJ368CAT
..... scale accordingly the applicant contends that limiting the number of annual increment to 4 is arbitrary and unjust as it equates the ..... provision under any service rules to take away the benefits of increments already earned by a government servant and the present rule which ..... not in conflict with the rules governing the grant of annual increments much less fr 24 and neither the said proviso high handed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2003
Reported in: [2003(4)JCR623(Jhr)]
..... manifest that the disciplinary authority may impose punishment mentioned therein including forfeiture of last increment of increments the only question therefore falls for consideration is as to whether stoppage of 15 ..... it proper to reduce the punishment imposed by the appellate authority from 15 increments to 3 increments 9 for the aforesaid reason this writ application is allowed in part and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhagat Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh
Decided on: Feb-24-2003
Reported in: (2003)(3)SLJ353CAT
..... every employee has been made entitled to second proficiency step up increment on completion of 16 years of service provided his over all ..... annexure a 3 quoted above his claim for second step up increment was negatived it is in these circumstances that the applicant has ..... decision has been taken to grant him atleast two step up increments at two different stages this benefit is available to those .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnail Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-14-2003
Reported in: (2003)IILLJ709P& H; (2003)133PLR483
..... 48 crores from the retrenchee employee of ranjit sagar dam who had been given the increments over and above to which they were actually entitled therefore the petitioner was liable to ..... from the respondent department the respondents have admitted that the petitioner had been granted the increments inadvertently the alleged excess payment cannot be recovered as the petitioner is not guilty of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNandakumar Vs. Chief Conservator of Forests
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-10-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)KLT1155; (2004)IILLJ109Ker
..... are different under the kerala civil services classification control and appeal rules 1960 withholding of increment with cumulative effect is only a minor punishment and therefore no detailed enquiry will ..... classification control and appeal rules 1960 which is applicable to the petitioner withholding of increments was only a minor punishment for which no formal enquiry was necessary therefore we .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaidhyanath Prasad Singh Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-28-2003
Reported in: [2003(3)JCR144(Jhr)]
..... pass the said examination but inspite thereof all due promotions and increments were allowed to the employees in the case in hand also ..... supreme court has further held that no arrears of the stopped increment shall be payable even though the person would pass the examination ..... case the petitioner is not claiming the arrears of any stopped increment on account of non passing of the said examination the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial