Increment - Judgment Search Results

Dr. Prajneshu S/O Sh. H.C. Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... entry in service they also gave representations that they should also be given two advance increments for possessing ph d degree however their representations were rejected vide order dated 12 ..... being a research institute acquisition of knowledge is rightly being given a premium this advance increment has a reasonable nexus to the object of having knowledgeable and technically qualified specialist .....

Radha Krishna Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through Chief

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... this course he has raised three submissions in support of his contention when admittedly increments were sanctioned to him by the governmental authority recognizing the typewriting qualification a review ..... such qualifications mistake or oversight by his superior officers whereby the employee could gain increments therefore was required to be rectified when the mistake was noticed 13 the applicant .....

Syed Abdul Qadir and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2009(1)SC385; 2009(1)SCALE36; (2009)3SCC475; 2009(3)SLJ38(SC)

..... mentioned that while under fr 22 c there was provision for grant of an additional increment on promotion to the higher post carrying duties and responsibilities of greater importance there was ..... would not automatically delete amend or substitute the same and therefore the benefit of additional increment on promotion was rightly extended to the appellants the next submission of the learned counsel .....

Smt. Santoshi Devi W/O Ex. Const Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... bhan and mohinder singh the enquiry that proceeded resulted into punishment of withholding of one increment when however chander bhan alone challenged the said order the de novo enquiry that ..... 2000 passed by the disciplinary and the appellate authorities inflicting punishment of withholding of one increment for one year insofar as mohinder singh is concerned had attained finality they were not .....

Smt. Meena Thakur and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2008(2)JCR560(Jhr)]

..... examination for child development project officers in absence of recruitment rules therefore sanctioning annual increment to them has remained at stand still10 in view of the facts noticed above ..... of jharkhand is directed to take immediate steps for giving the benefits of annual increments to the petitioners and similarly situated other child development project officers forthwith motor vehicles .....

State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Kartik Chandra Mahto

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2008(4)JCR470(Jhr)]

..... the learned single judge the learned single judge further ordered that the petitioner s annual increment shall not be withheld before the departmental accounts examination is held and result thereof is ..... pleased to hold that the respondent state although might be correct in stating that the increment should be paid only after clearing the departmental examination the fact remains that the .....

Dinanath Mahadeo Hadke Vs. Zilla Parishad and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(6)ALLMR184; 2008(6)MhLj592

..... service rendered by them prior to their retrenchment for purposes of increment in the post in which have been absorbed provided their re ..... years service in the past service are not entitled to any increments at all the chart given in the government resolution however does ..... service is only for the purpose of pension and not for increment or pay fixation the fact of condonation of break in service .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Sanal Kumar

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [2008(118)FLR1069]

..... by the first respondent seeking for a direction to release the annual increment that fell due on 1 1 1996 with consequential benefits he ..... taken the view that the applicant is entitled to be paid the increment which fell due on 1 1 1996 and granted consequential benefits ..... the duties attached to a post the question of drawing an increment does not arise reliance is also placed on the recent decision .....

Uttar Pradesh Power Corpn. Limited and Another Vs. Noida Power Corpn. ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... 8221 in the contract between the two parties marginal cost is the incremental cost to procure the next unit of electricity uppcl has been ..... being the 8216 marginal cost 8217 defining it to be as 8220 incremental cost to procure next unit of electricity 8221 which is an ..... the marginal cost was the average rate of the rates of the incremental power purchase of the 400 mw of additional power or the .....

R.P. Hrishikeshan Nair and Others Vs. Union of India Represented by th ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

..... continue to pay trca to her at that rate with annual increments admissible thereon with consequential benefits including arrears of trca being the ..... not forfeit his past service for any purpose which include the increments drawn by him in the previous post it is in such ..... trca and nowhere the term pay has been used similarly for increment which are nbsp periodical increase in respect of pay here it .....