Incorrectly - Judgment Search Results

Dhruv N. Shah Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)88ITD188(Mum.)

..... is irrelevant that whether ao has discussed any issue in detail or not incorrect assumption of facts or incorrect application of law is sufficient for invoking jurisdiction under section 263 by the ..... at the time of hearing before me the learned counsel submitted that the cit has incorrectly assumed jurisdiction under section 263 without sufficient reasons in this connection my attention was invited .....

Dhruv N. Shah Vs. Dy. Cit

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2004]88ITD118(Mum)

..... that whether assessing officer has discussed any issue in detail or not incorrect assumption of facts or incorrect application of law is sufficient for invoking jurisdiction under section 263 by ..... the time of hearing before me the learned counsel submitted that the commissioner has incorrectly assumed jurisdiction under section 263 without sufficient reasons in this connection my attention was .....

Paramjit Kaur and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2004)136PLR753

v k bali j 1 petitioners who are son and daughters of shri rajinder singh real brother of shaheed a...

Anand and Company Vs. Acit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (2004)89ITD125(Kol.)

depreciation allowed set off by assessing officer on incorrect assumption of facts as well as on incorrect application of law...

K.C.K.A. Gupta Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (2004)90TTJ(Hyd.)555

are filed by the assessee against separate orders of the commissioner 4 hyderabad dated 8 3 2002 and 22 3...

Premlal Tiwari Vs. the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education and ors ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(4)MPHT414; 2003(4)MPLJ563

orderarun mishra j 1 petitioner in this writ petition has prayed for the relief to declare nd publish the results...

Miller-el Vs. Cockrell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... objectively unreasonable by clear and convincing evidence this was too demanding a standard because it incorrectly merged the clear and convincing evidence standard of 2254 e 1 which pertains only to ..... court decision and applies to the granting of habeas relief more fundamentally the court was incorrect in not inquiring whether a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right had .....

Bishwanath Dubey and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

the act itself 31 if any benefit has been received incorrectly or wrongfully as a result of collusion or suppression of

Raidurg Co-operative House Building Society Limited and ors. Vs. Gover ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(3)ALD2; 2004(3)ALT221

orderv v s rao j introduction1 the core question in all the five writ petitions is whether the government of...

Court of Its Own Motion Vs. A.J. Philip, Printer, Publisher and Offici ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2004)136PLR421

g s singhvi j 1 transgression of restrictions and limitations which are in built in the freedom of speech and...