Incorrectly - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: incorrectly Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 1,192 results (0.023 seconds)Supreme Paper Mills Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-19-2002
Reported in: (2003)1CALLT446(HC)
s p talukdar j 1 the petitioner viz supreme paper mills ltd filed an application under section 8 of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSitar Video Hall Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-23-2002
Reported in: 2002(1)AWC542
binod kumar roy and u s tripathi jj 1 the petitioner sitar video hall which claims to be situate in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPremier Automobiles Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-18-2002
Reported in: (2003)84ITD169(Mum.)
1 this appeal pertains to the asst yr 1995 96 though six grounds were urged by the assessee company at...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Commerce and Industries Co. Pvt. Limited Vs. the Commercial Tax ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-25-2002
Reported in: [2003]129STC509(Mad)
orderk raviraja pandian j 1 in all the cases the petitioners challenge the imposition of interest for the belated payment...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.P.G. Ramasamy Nadar and Sons Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Apr-05-2002
Reported in: (2004)136STC599Tribunal
1 this tax case appeal is directed against the order dated may 28 1998 of the joint commissioner smr ii...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Rajasthan Vs. Jagdish Rai Mittal and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-30-2002
Reported in: 2003(2)WLC199; 2003(2)WLN75
n n mathur j 1 in all these three writ petitions under article 226 of the constitution of india arising...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTion Exchange (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jul-16-2002
Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT499Tri(Chennai)
order 17 the appellants state that the learned collector has incorrectly observed in para 42 that packing is company s brain
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJoint Cit Vs. Pact Securities and Financial Ltd.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-26-2002
Reported in: (2003)86ITD115(Hyd.)
1 the order of the learned commissioner appeals v central hyderabad in so far as it is against the appellant...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSouth Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Jt. Cit
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur
Decided on: Feb-28-2002
Reported in: (2002)77TTJ(Nag.)401
..... assessee pointed out that this submission made by the learned departmental representative is factually incorrect the learned departmental representative was directed by the bench to ascertain the correct factual ..... quantum liability assuming nomenclature of companies contribution of p f but the same was incorrectly classified as contribution to provident fund after considering the facts of the case .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSouth Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur
Decided on: Feb-28-2002
Reported in: (2003)260ITR1(Nag.)
..... assessee pointed out that this submission made by the learned departmental representative is factually incorrect the learned departmental representative was directed by the bench to ascertain the correct factual ..... quantum liability assuming nomenclature of companies contribution of p p but the same was incorrectly classified as contribution to provident fund after considering the facts of the case .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial