Incorrectly - Judgment Search Results

K. Jagannadha Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1519; 1981LabIC1096; (1981)IILLJ252SC; 1981(3)SCALE1079; (1981)3SCC604; [1982]1SCR69; 1981(2)SLJ234(SC); 1981(13)LC601(SC)

a c gupta j 1 the vires of rule 3 d of the andhra pradesh police service rules 1966 is...

Laxmi Khandsari and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC873; 1981(1)SCALE455; (1981)2SCC600; [1981]3SCR92

1 inspired by the objective of removing nation wide shortage of sugar and for the purpose of enhancing sugar production...

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

p n bhagwati j 1 these writ petitions filed in different high courts and transferred to this court under article...

State of U.P. Vs. Prescribed Authority, Kiccha (Rudrapur) Nainital and ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1982All151

orderk p singh j 1 this writ petition is by the state of u p against the judgment of shri...

industrial Plastic Corporation Private Limited and Others Vs. Union of ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1983(12)ELT425(Bom)

1 in this petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india the question which requires determination is whether...

Rhodes Vs. Chapman

Court: US Supreme Court

..... question before us the majority adds is not whether the designer of socf guessed incorrectly about future prison population but whether the actual conditions of confinement at socf are ..... presumed reason for the request for protective custody and unconstitutionally cramped quarters the majority asserts incorrectly that some of these inmates have committed rule infractions ibid in fact inmates who .....

Tipco the Industrial Plastic Corporation Private Limited and Two ors. ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1989(25)LC360(Bombay)

m l pendse j 1 in this petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india the question which...

H. L. Vs. Matheson

Court: US Supreme Court

predicament or that even if they are receptive they will incorrectly advise her does not undercut the legitimacy of the state

Sardar Govindrao Mahadik and anr. Vs. Devi Sahai and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC989; 1982(1)SCALE191; (1982)1SCC237; [1982]2SCR186

desai j 1 what constitutes part performance within the meaning of the expression in section 53 a of the transfer...

Schweiker Vs. Hansen

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in effect for a year and a half when respondent was incorrectly informed that she was not eligible moreover it is quite ..... so inclined footnote 2 3 finally to conclude that connelly s incorrect assessment of respondent s eligibility did not cause her to ..... to must rest squarely with the government first because its agent incorrectly advised her that she was ineligible for benefits and second because .....