Inconsequential - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: inconsequential Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 48 results (0.008 seconds)Constable Davinder Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-15-1995
Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)636; AIR1996SC1050; JT1995(9)SC476; 1996LabIC933; 1996(1)SCALE121; (1996)7SCC153; [1995]Supp6SCR786
..... would not come to depose in such cases non examination of independent witnesses would be inconsequential indian penal code 1890 section 300 murder contradiction between medical and ocular evidence evidence of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManjunatha Roller Flour Mills Private Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-26-1995
Reported in: ILR1995KAR2196
..... is now well settled that non labeling or wrong labelling of a statutory provision is inconsequential so long as the power jurisdiction exercised is referable to some statutory source for the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Suresh Mahindra
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT
Decided on: Feb-02-1995
Reported in: (1995)54ITD401(Bang.)
..... of this averment the ito thus concluded that the aforesaid order of the court is inconsequential to determine the present issue the ito finally concluded that the claim of the assessee ..... with the point raised by the ito in this regard that the said decree is inconsequential inasmuch as the court passed its order simply on the basis of the averment of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnil Umrao Gote Vs. Rajwardhan Raghujirao Kadambonde @ Rajubaba
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-01-1995
Reported in: 1996(2)BomCR491
..... before me his designation and the stamped endorsement regarding the affirmation cannot be regarded as inconsequential it is an omission of a vital nature which is likely to prejudice the returned ..... are appearing in the affidavit are of fatal and crucial nature and not insignificant or inconsequential as was the case before the apex court in the said case 32 i would .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaharashtra Shramik Sena Vs. Gabriel India Ltd. and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-24-1995
Reported in: [1995(71)FLR775]; (1996)ILLJ639Bom
..... it has tripped that does not disqualify it is also possible to conceive of other inconsequential deviations such minor departures cannot have an invalidatory effect however the requirements we are concerned ..... is that there should be substantial compliance and some deviation here or there which is inconsequential will not in validate the prayer of a particular union for recognition in the present .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEquipment Conductors and Cables Ltd. Vs. Haryana State Electricity Boa ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-13-1995
Reported in: (1996)112PLR604
..... declined by the board vide order dated 2 11 1994 annexure p 7 is wholly inconsequential and cannot be construed in a manner depriving the petitioner of its legitimate right to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Vinod Kumar Razdan Vs. State and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Mar-16-1995
Reported in: AIR1995J& K68
..... despite his superior merit which could not cure his inehgibility in the circumstances it was inconsequential that the petitioner had been issued the admit card and allowed to take the entrance .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLakshmi Shanmugham Vs. P.R. Shanmugham
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-13-1995
Reported in: II(1996)DMC21; (1996)IMLJ271
..... court below ignored the weight of evidence and allowed the judgment to be influenced by inconsequential matters the high court would be justified in reappreciating the evidence and coming to its .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.M. Vijayan and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-1995
Reported in: [1995]215ITR371(Mad)
..... sucrose content is the same for sugarcane in the state the marginal difference being too inconsequential to build a case of discrimination or is blamable on the old machinery neither in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDarshan Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-02-1995
Reported in: 1995CriLJ2138
..... eye witness also provide material corroboration to the other eye witness his cross examination is inconsequential thus it will be seen that the total evidence on record prove beyond reasonable doubt .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial