Skip to content


Inconsequential - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: inconsequential Year: 1985 Page 1 of about 35 results (0.006 seconds)
Dec 20 1985 (SC)

Manick Chandra Nandy Vs. Debdas Nandy and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-20-1985

Reported in: AIR1986SC446; 1985(2)SCALE1478; (1986)1SCC512; 1986(1)LC209(SC)

..... would not come to depose in such cases non examination of independent witnesses would be inconsequential indian penal code 1890 section 300 murder contradiction between medical and ocular evidence evidence of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 04 1985 (HC)

Chokkalingam Chettiar Vs. Agricultural I.T.O.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Oct-04-1985

Reported in: ILR1986KAR1126

..... order initiation of proceedings issue of show cause notice opportunity of hearing within 4 years inconsequential original assessment order having been made on 28 5 1976 and rectification notice being issued .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 1985 (HC)

N. Ranga Rao Vs. Government of India

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-26-1985

Reported in: (1986)IILLJ1AP

..... and void thereby the subsequent direction of the appellant to proceed on leave too became inconsequential and is of no effect 31 this problem could also be angulated from the annuls ..... acceptance of the request for voluntary retirement dated 28th may 1983 is void inoperative and inconsequential the order dated 19th october 1983 rejecting the application for withdrawal also is illegal and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 1985 (TRI)

Wealth-tax Officer Vs. A.K. Tandon

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-1985

Reported in: (1985)14ITD300(Delhi)

..... rs 1 195 earlier paid by the firm to the owners became non existent and inconsequential after the purchase the firm in fact occupied the specified portion as a free hold ..... rs 1 195 earlier paid by the firm to the owners became non existent and inconsequential after the purchase the firm in fact occupied the specific portion as a free hold .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 05 1985 (TRI)

Hindustan Teleprinters Limited Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-05-1985

Reported in: (1986)(7)LC79Tri(Chennai)

..... complete stage except for the provision of side covers front cover provision of a few inconsequential keys which were found separately in the same consignment and the provision of connecting power .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 05 1985 (TRI)

Kaloomal Shorimal Sachdev Vs. First Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-05-1985

Reported in: (1985)14ITD248(Mum.)

..... the assessee treated them as deposits is a fact which cannot be brushed aside as inconsequential 27 in paragraph no 14 of his order the learned vice president has dealt with .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 04 1985 (FN)

Wallace Vs. Jaffree

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-04-1985

..... 50 the importance of that principle does not permit us to treat this as an inconsequential case involving nothing more than a few words of symbolic speech on behalf of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 09 1985 (FN)

Ohio Vs. Kovacs

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-09-1985

..... any property of the estate that is burdensome to the estate or that is of inconsequential value to the estate 11 u s c 554 such abandonment is to the person .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 1985 (HC)

Dina Dara Sukhia Vs. Vijay Dattatraya Kanhere and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-11-1985

Reported in: 1986(2)BomCR332

..... delivered in spl c a no 1540 of 1977 this plea was raised seriously and inconsequentially as and when it suited the respondents until the modis and bhagwanis would ward off .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 1985 (HC)

State of Orissa Vs. Arjun Mallik

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Dec-16-1985

Reported in: 1986(I)OLR68

..... facts of the case and in the context this could not be characterised as an inconsequential omission and this would amount to a contradiction within the explanation to section 162 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //