Inc V United - Judgment Search Results

Prasad Mathew, Prop: Metro Entertainment Network Vs. S.C.V. Unit of Su ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2004(1)CTLJ422(Mad); (2003)3MLJ784

for grant of franchise by the franchiser on certain terms and conditions to the franchisee. Such agreements often incorporate a condition that the franchisee shall not deal with competing goods. Such a condition restricting the right of … 5. O.S. No: 2881 of 2003 was filed on 6.6.2003 for a declaration that the franchise agreement was valid and for a permanent injunction restraining the franchise from disconnecting the link or discontinuing the transmission or from

United India Periodicals (P) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissione ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1994)50TTJ(Del)84

the source of repayment of loan to M/s Globe Associates P. Ltd. It was claimed that Dr. A. V. Baliga had received donations from different persons and those donations were utilised for repayment of the loan. The … under s. 154 of the IT Act, 1961.3. Subsequently on getting fresh information, the Assessing Officer concluded that income escaped assessment and, accordingly, reassessment proceedings were initiated. It was found that the assessed had received a loan

Members of the Combined Civilian Employees Union of Controllerate of Q ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Hon'ble High Court of Bombay was whether the term "members of the armed forces of the Union" would include the employees, such as clerks, Superintendents, meter readers, electricians, drivers, stenographers, librarians, storekeepers, education instructors, carpenters, draftsmen, senior … ORAL ORDER (As per Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Lakshmana Reddy, Vice-Chairman) Heard Mr. K.R.K.V. Prasad, learned counsel for the applicants and and Mr. G. Jaya Prakash Babu, learned Senior … Combined Civilian Employees Union of Controllerate of Quality Assurance- Comprising of 5 Units viz., Controller of quality Assurance (System), Controller of Quality Assurance (Electronics) Warfare,

American National Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

the effective date of the Jurisdictional Act of 1925. And this direct appeal was allowed. J. Homer Fritch, Inc. v. United States, 248 U. S. 458 . The question here presented is whether, under the provisions of the Revenue

Delaware, Lackawanna and Western R. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. Co. v United States - 231 U.S. 363 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. Co. v United States, … from market to mine. But the statute relates to "all commodities, except lumber, owned by the company," and includes inbound as well as outbound shipments. Both classes of transportation are within the purview of the evil to