Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

In V Rama - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 08 1959

N.P. Sankaran Nair Vs. P.V. Rama Iyer

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Sep-08-1959

Reported in: AIR1960Ker131

Cochin Harbour Railway station which ran as follows : 'Collections of date received from S. M. (1) P. V. Rama Iyer at 14 hours. Rs. 286-3-0 against Rs. 96-8-0 or Rs. 10-5-0 short. Same spent by S. M.


Jan 28 2026

Sri V Rama Murthy vs the State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-28-2026

JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 543 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN:1. SRI V RAMA MURTHY SON OF B VENKATA REDDY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)2. SMT RADHAMMA DAUGHTER


Feb 13 2025

Sri K.V. Rama Reddy vs the National Seeds Corporation Ltd.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-13-2025

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO.10282 OF 2014 (S-RES) BETWEEN:1. SRI K.V. RAMA REDDYS/O. LATE SRI VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS FORMERLY WORKING AS ASSISTANT GR.II, NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD., UAS CAMPUS, HEBBAL BANGALORE AND


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 21 2025

K.V.Rama Moorthy vs N.C.Pandian

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-21-2025

are covered by an order of this Court in the case of Upendra Hosdrug Sundar Kamath and others vs. K.G.Inian made in Crl.O.P.No.18951 of 2017 dated 12.01.2022. In similar circumstances, this Courthas elaborately dealt with the issues


Aug 28 2024

Sri M V Rama Rao vs the Commissioner

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Aug-28-2024

OF 2024 (LB-TAX) BETWEEN:1. SRI M.V RAMA RAO, S/O SRI M. SIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,2. SRI P. VENKATASWARULU,S/O SRI GARALIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, Digitally signed by 3. SRI S. HANUMANTHA RAO, BHARATHI S S/O SRI


Jun 08 2006

V. Rama Shetty S/O V. Babu Shetty Vs. N. Sasidaran Nayar Major, Teleco ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-08-2006

Reported in: II(2007)BC597

Matched in: Parties V. Rama Shetty S/O V. Babu Shetty Vs. N. Sasidaran Nayar Major, Telecommunication Employee


Dec 12 2006

Sri K.V. Rama Rao, S/O Venkatechalaiah, Vs. Prashanth theatre, Rep. by ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-12-2006

Reported in: ILR2007KAR640; (2007)IILLJ653Kant

Matched in: Parties Sri K.V. Rama Rao, S/O Venkatechalaiah, Vs. Prashanth theatre, Rep. by Its Managing Director G.R. Bharat Saikumar, S/O G.V. Rajashekar,


Mar 16 2005

P.V. Rama Sarma Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-16-2005

Reported in: 2005(3)ALD361; 2005(3)ALT230

the panels.In this connection, reference may be made to a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in V. Kishore Kumar v. The State of A.P. through The Secretary, Law (CTS.) Department, Hdyerabad, : 1991(2)ALT589 , wherein … C.J.1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner (Sri P.V. Rama Sarma), a former District and Sessions Judge, challenges the order passed by the 1st respondent in G.O. Ms.


Dec 02 2008

V. Rama Prasad S/O V. Rangaiah Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. b ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-02-2008

Reported in: 2009(3)ALT699

Matched in: Parties V. Rama Prasad S/O V. Rangaiah Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Secretary to Government, Transport Department and the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by Its Secretary


Sep 01 2007

V. Rama Rao Vs. T. Raghunathan and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-01-2007

Reported in: AIR2008AP92

in Chappidi Subbareddy (died) v. Chappidi Narapureddy 2006(2) ALT 49 (D.B.) : AIR 2006 AP 662.3. Sri G. Rama Gopal, the learned Counsel for the 1st respondent, on the other hand, submits that the transfer is between … transferred the suit schedule property in favour of the 1st respondent, through the sale deed, dated 20-12-2005. In view of this development, the 1st respondent filed I. A. No. 693 of 2006 under Rule 10(2) of Order


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial