In The Pay Of - Judgment Search Results

The Pay and Accounts Office Employees Joint Action Committee, Rep. by ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1995(3)ALT782

the impugned G.O. relates to service conditions, be it the Pay and Accounts Office staff or Treasuries and Accounts Department staff,

Auraiya Pay Office of Imperial Bank of India Vs. Notified Area Committ ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1938All302

saw the justice of deducting Rs. 4734 spent by the Pay Office on salaries, house rent, etc. from the gross receipts,

Lakshadweep Special Pay Opted Pensioners' Association (LSPPA) and Othe ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

notionally fixing the pay under Rule 7 of CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997 by reckoning Island Special pay as part of

I Pay Clearing Services Private Limited Vs. Icici Bank Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

has passed award dated 13.11.2017, directing the respondent herein, to pay to the appellant – claimant an amount of Rs.50,00,00,000/- (Rupees

Pay and Accounts Officer (Ew) Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)28ITD403(Delhi)

only because of these elaborate provisions that finally the person paying salary is required to furnish a prescribed return under Section

Pay and Accounts Officer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)219CTR(Mad)197; [2009]316ITR197(Mad)

ELT 739.12. In the present appeals, the appellant i.e., the Pay and Accounts Officer is representing the Government of Tamil Nadu.

The Pay & Accounts Officer vs.aifaa & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Advs. for R-1. + Crl.M.C. 732/2013 & Crl.M.A. 2569/2013 THE PAY & ACCOUNTS OFFICER ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sanjeev Narula,

Govind Pay Oxygen Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector Central Excise, Panaji ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1984)86BOMLR14; 1987(11)ECC204; 1989(20)LC404(Bombay); 1986(23)ELT394(Bom); [1982]134ITR268a(Bom)

Rules, 1944 on execution of a bond for differential duty payable on the basis of value including the cost of packing

Namdeo Dyanoba Garad Vs. Superintendent, Pay Distribution Unit and ors ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(4)ALLMR791; 2001(4)BomCR380; (2002)4BOMLR252; [2002(92)FLR186]; 2002(3)MhLj431

B.A. examination in 1976 and therefore, he was given the pay scale as applicable to the graduate trained teacher with effect

Pccare247 Solutions Pvt Ltd vs.pay Commerce India Private Limited

Court: Delhi

CS(COMM) 488/2016 Page 7 of 10 1,29,031.59 remains due and payable by the defendant to the plaintiff as on 03rd September,