In Respect Of Anything Said In Parliament - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: in respect of anything said in parliament Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 314 results (0.676 seconds)Jyothi Home Industries Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-21-1986
Reported in : ILR1986KAR3831; [1987]64STC208(Kar)
..... exclusive power of the union parliament with respect to subjects in list i this is notwithstanding anything in the next two clauses ..... supreme court in lohia machines case 1985 152itr308 sc said parliament has thus not parted with its control over the ..... the compulsions that render delegation of legislative powers inevitable said the complexities of modern administration are so bafflingly intricate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarayanlal Himatlal Bhatt and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Apr-04-1986
Reported in : (1986)2GLR1240
..... as follows 246 i notwithstanding anything in clauses 2 and 3 parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the ..... thereof article 195 deals with salaries and allowances of members the said article reads as follows 195 members of the legislative assembly ..... of the state legislature and cannot in any way be said either unconstitutional or against the nation s interest no doubt .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.K. Trivedi and Sons and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-05-1986
Reported in : AIR1986SC1323a; (1986)2GLR1250; 1986(1)SCALE1133; 1986Supp(1)SCC20; [1986]1SCR479; 1986(2)LC301(SC)
..... a restrictive provision with respect to dead rent shows that it was not the intention of parliament to confer power upon ..... and minerals regulation and development amendment act 1972 shall notwithstanding anything contained in the instrument of lease or in any ..... exploiting labourers and evading payment of royalty according to the said statement such lease holders quarried just enough minerals and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrahladi Devi and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : May-14-1986
Reported in : 1987(1)WLN113
the rajasthan land acquisition act 1953 provide lesser amount with respect to interest and solatium consequently they are repugnant to the such accused has to be treated as juvenile under the said act the claimants however were not satisfied with the order if there is repugnancy between subsequent legislation made by the parliament and the law operating in the state the law enacted
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Shakuntalabai Krishna Bhoyar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-01-1986
Reported in : AIR1986Bom308; 1986(3)BomCR163; 1986MhLJ669
act it being a later law made by parliament with respect to the same matter the west bengal amendment act stood shall be payable from the date of expiry of the said period of one year on the amount of such excess to the provisions of clause 2 the law made by parliament whether passed before or after the law made by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Sambamurthy and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-20-1986
Reported in : (1987)ILLJ221SC; 1986(2)SCALE1168; (1987)1SCC362; [1987]1SCR879; 1987(1)LC279(SC)
the administrative tribunal the jurisdiction of the high court in respect of the specified service matters this constitutional amendment authorising exclusion the mulki rules existing in the telangana area could be said to be continuing in force by virtue of article 35 soon after the formation of the state of andhra pradesh parliament enacted public employment requirement as to residence act 1957 making
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Chandra Kala Vs. Smt. Jeewani
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : May-09-1986
Reported in : 1987(2)WLN415
landlord and tenant in so far as it arises in respect of house accommodation situated in cantonment areas the parliament alone standing such supersession all suits and other proceedings under the said notification pending immediately before the commencement of this notification before in respect of house accommodation situated in cantonment areas the parliament alone can legislate and not the state legislatures the effect
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPurshottam Dass Tandon and ors. Vs. State of U.P. Lucknow and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Mar-25-1986
Reported in : AIR1987All56
the leases it could not be held as assurance in respect of area and premium as well reliance was placed on in unison denial or going back on what has been said by one is destructive of harmony and cohesiveness which should meaning articles 246 to 254 carve out legislative field of parliament and state legislature making them supreme in their domain but
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManika Dei and ors. Vs. Dhadia Madgul and ors.
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Mar-04-1986
Reported in : AIR1987Ori74; 61(1986)CLT436
the suit the petitioners shall have to prove title in respect of the suit land by way of gift and adverse of landlord and tenant operates as res judicata and the said finding is not available to be reagitated in the civil high court that by enacting explanation viii the intention of parliament was only to bring the decisions of courts other than
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhanwar Singh Vs. Navrang Singh
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jan-08-1986
Reported in : AIR1987Raj63; 1986(1)WLN376
..... by courts in electoral matters notwithstanding anything in this constitution no election to either house of parliament or to the house or either ..... and the law administered in any existing high court and the respective powers of the judges thereof in relation to the administration of ..... the high court under article 225 of the constitution and the said rule is violative of section 81 1 of the act as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT