In Respect Of Anything Said In Parliament - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: in respect of anything said in parliament Year: 1959 Page 1 of about 312 results (0.699 seconds)Lachhman Vs. Pyarchand and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Feb-16-1959
Reported in : AIR1959Raj169
..... for defamation will lie in respect of them thus no member of parliament in our country can be made liable for defamation in respect of anything said by him in parliament or in any committee thereof ..... see article 105 of the constitution the same privilege is enjoyed by a member of the legislature of a state in respect of anything said .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrem Nath Kaul Vs. the State of Jammu and Kashmir
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-02-1959
Reported in : AIR1959SC749; [1959]Supp(2)SCR270
..... notwithstanding anything in this constitution a the provisions of article 238 shall not apply in relation to the state of jammu kashmir b the power of parliament to make laws for the said ..... there shall until the constituent assembly of the state settles the question of compensation with respect to the land expropriated under this act be paid by the government to every proprietor .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKhimji Poojnja and Co. Vs. N. Ramanlal and Co. and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-13-1959
Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR277
..... case where both the legislature of a state and the parliament legislate with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the concurrent ..... a of the former act it was provided that not withstanding anything in the government of india act 1935 the indian legislature ..... the east india cotton association or with a member of the said association were not permitted under the notification there is undoubtedly .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMukunda Das Nandy and ors. Vs. Bidhan Chandra Roy and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jul-01-1959
Reported in : AIR1960Cal67,63CWN834
..... statutory exceptions or exemptions were made prevailed on parliament to enact the said special exemptions in their favour than that the ..... the different authorities and text books do not lay clown anything more than that the maxim expressio unius est expressio alterius ..... unius exclusio alterius should apply whereas the provisions made in respect of the tax upon the profits of foreign possessions or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahavirprasad Badrida Vs. M.S. Yagnik
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jul-27-1959
Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR1433
..... by entry no 97 which confers upon the union parliament power to legislate in respect of any other matter not enumerated in list ii ..... render him liable to wealth tax under this act then notwithstanding anything contained in sub section 1 he may serve a notice upon ..... and enjoyment of the profits of the property they cannot be said to possess individually any several properitary right other than the right .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahavirprasad Badridas Vs. M.S. Yagnik, Second Wealth-tax Officer, C-i ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-27-1959
Reported in : AIR1960Bom191; [1959]37ITR191(Bom)
..... by entry no 97 which confers upon the union parliament power to legislate in respect of any other matter not enumerated in list ii ..... render him liable to wealth tax under this act then notwithstanding anything contained in sub section 1 he may serve a notice upon ..... assets expressly confined such imposition to individuals and companies it was said that if it was intended to empower the union legislature .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrijmohan and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Sep-10-1959
Reported in : AIR1960Raj118
before the law between citizens of the same state in respect of their right or privilege to marry it is however enumerated in the concurrent list the law made by the parliament must prevail and the law made by the legislature must
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSreenivas and Co. Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Moore Market ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Oct-16-1959
Reported in : [1960]11STC68(Mad)
the restriction imposed by article 286 3 is only with respect to the law imposing sales tax by the legislature of commodity covered by act lii of 1952 could not be said to be a law passed by the state legislature imposing l r 362 latham c j observed at page 373 parliamentary practice has given effect to these provisions by distinguishing between
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTextile Labour Union, Nadiad Vs. New Shorrock Spinning and Manufacturi ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-21-1959
Reported in : (1960)ILLJ129Bom
the person employed or otherwise to a person employed in respect of his employment and includes any bonus or other additional as will appeal from the following observations it is sometimes said that two laws cannot be said to be properly repugnant made by the state legislature this means that if the parliament passed any law after the assent or subsequent to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLachhman Das Makhan Lal and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-26-1959
Reported in : AIR1960P& H394
..... as limiting in any way the power of the parliament to make laws with respect to taxes on income accruing from or arising out ..... of the constitution which is in these terms 276 1 notwithstanding anything in art 246 no law of the legislature of state relating ..... who appeared for the ujjain municipality that the imposition of the said performance tax under consideration was open to this criticism in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT