Skip to content


In Respect Of Anything Said In Parliament - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: in respect of anything said in parliament Court: mumbai Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.911 seconds)
Apr 01 1986 (HC)

Smt. Shakuntalabai Krishna Bhoyar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-1986

Reported in : AIR1986Bom308; 1986(3)BomCR163; 1986MhLJ669

of section 15 and section 18 of the amendment act respectively they contended that these amendments have been given retrospective effect therefore say with respect that the learned judges of the said division bench committed an error when in paragraph 17 of repugnant to the provisions of an earlier law made by parliament or an existing law with respect to that matter then

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 14 1986 (HC)

Gopalkrishna Ramchandra Chavan and ors., Etc. Vs. State of Maharastra ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-14-1986

Reported in : (1986)88BOMLR230; 1987MhLJ665

..... 13 7 and 4 24 for sc st and dt nt respectively cannot be said to be excesive 10 mr seervai therefore does not invite us ..... of union territory as the case may be article 341 2 empowers parliament to alter this list by law but it canot be altered by ..... conrrnespondingly excluded from recruitment because the large bulk of the vacancies numbering anything over 50 is allotted to the reserved quota in view of a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 03 1986 (HC)

Manohar S. Prabhu and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-03-1986

Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR130

..... the said article 239 a was inserted in the constitution is beyond the powers of the parliament under articles 368 to amend the constitution 5 article 368 1 provides that notwithstanding anything in ..... and small scale industries development corporation limited the economic development corporation can give directions in respect of the change of the capital the board of directors and all the relevant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 12 1986 (HC)

Rekapally Laxminarayana Rao Naidu Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-12-1986

Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR31; (1987)ILLJ360Bom; 1986MhLJ838

..... india therefore according to mr natu it cannot be said that the parliament has exceeded its legislative powers or competence in ..... 3 the provisions of this article shall have effect notwithstanding anything in any other provision of this constitution or in ..... adjudication by administrative tribunal of all disputes and complaints with respect to recruitment and conditions of service of civil servants .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 1986 (HC)

Ranbir Rajkapoor Vs. S.S. Bhonsale, Tax Recovery Officer and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-08-1986

Reported in : [1986]162ITR153(Bom)

pendse j 1 the petitioner is the owner of an immovable property known as daboo house plot no 16 jay...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 03 1986 (HC)

Wipro Products Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-03-1986

Reported in : 1986(8)LC665(Bombay)

appliances and diskettes by no stretch of imagination can be said to be machines or mechanical appliances shri rege relying upon

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 1986 (HC)

Kirtilal Moolchand and Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-24-1986

Reported in : 1988(14)LC52(Bombay)

and the respondents are directed to issue detention certificate in respect of bill of entry no 260 79 for the period

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 1986 (HC)

Kirtilal Moolchand and Co. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-24-1986

Reported in : 1987(11)ECC78; 1986(25)ELT620(Bom)

commencing from may 8 1980 to october 8 1980 in respect of bills of entries nos 6 92 and 260 78

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 09 1986 (HC)

Associated Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-1986

Reported in : (1986)88BOMLR112; 1989(20)LC33(Bombay); 1986MhLJ272

in fact in the affidavit of the respondents it is said that the facility to export the goods under the provisions

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 31 1986 (HC)

Ruby Mills and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-31-1986

Reported in : 1986(10)ECC202; 1988(15)LC336(Bombay); 1986(25)ELT610(Bom)

directed to ascertain how much excess duty was recovered in respect of import of lucop step and repeat machine by the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //