In Order To - Judgment Search Results
Civil Writ Petition No. 22723 of 2011 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No. 2272 ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
in the Digest?. Rajive Bhalla, J. (Oral) The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing order dated 02.08.2011 passed by the Director, Land Records, Punjab, Jalandhar. The short point that arises for adjudication is,
Civil Writ Petition No.25543 of 2012 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.25543 ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
petitioner at some length and gone through various documents. 9].In our considered view, no interference with the impugned orders passed by the respondent-authorities in rejecting CWP No.25543 of 2012 [4].the petitioner's complaint or in upholding the allotment
Civil Writ Petition No.24971 of 2012 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.24971 ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
of the writ petition be supplied to the learned State counsel during the couRs.of day failing which the order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution. In
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Civil Writ Petition No.2291 of 2009 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.2291 of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
be reported in the Digest?. Yes RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J. The challenge in this petition is to an order dated 25.2.2008 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Moga, declining sanction under Section 197 of the Code
Civil Writ Petition No.4039 of 1988 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.4039 of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos.4039 and 4884 of 1988 as both these petitions impugn the Town
Civil Writ Petition No.651 of 1984 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.651 of 1 ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
On consideration of the additional material on record, this Court passed the following order on 28.03.2007 :- “..... In order to better understand the legal submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the State should, in addition … apprised of any order passed in this regard and requests for some time. Accordingly, we adjourn the matter in order to enable him to seek instructions. If any such order is passed, then the same be placed on record,
Civil Writ Petition No.4498 of 1993 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.4498 of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos.4498, 4102, 4117, 4478, 5029, 8042, 3700, 3831, 3933, 3956, 3958, 3960,
Civil Writ Petition No. 9973 of 2013(Oandm) Vs. Civil Writ Petition No ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-22-2013
a statue of a resident of the village, who died while working in the Border Security Force. An order dated 09.05.2013 was passed by this Court while issuing notice of motion. A relevant extract of this order
Civil Writ Petition No.5973 of 2010 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.5973 of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 3.8.2009 (Annexure P-10) passed by respondent No.2-Ludhiana Improvement Trust, Ludhiana, rejecting his claim for allotment of a
Civil Writ Petition No.18593 of 2013 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.18593 ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
copies of the writ petition be supplied to learned State counsel during the couRs.of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution. In
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free