In Camera - Judgment Search Results

Dass Camera Centre vs Commercial Tax Officer (St)

Court: Chennai

OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 09.04.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.3539, 3540 and 3541 of 2024 Dass Camera Centre, Represented by its Sole Proprietrix Pauline Mary … Petitioner in all W.Ps Vs.Commercial Tax Officer (ST), Harbour

Ace Camera Equipment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1983)36CTR(Bom)385; [1984]150ITR227(Bom); [1983]15TAXMAN223(Bom)

1963-64 ?'2. The question is raised at the instance of the assessee.3. The assessee deals in and manufactures cameras. During the accounting year relevant to the assessment year 1963-64, the assessee purchased second hand dies of the

Central Camera Company Limited Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1981(8)ELT344(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Central Camera Company Limited Vs. Union of India and Others

Camera House, Bombay Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1969Bom437; [1970]25STC354(Bom)

production of goods for sale, and that, with the advance that has been made in the manufacture of cameras, and even in the matter of the subsequent process of developing, printing and enlarging in the studio, there

Central Camera Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. the Government of Madras

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1971]27STC112(Mad)

Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. The assessee, Messrs Central Camera Company (Private) Limited, dealers in photographic materials at No. 35/4 Mount Road, Madras, was subjected to assessment under

Cce Vs. Camera World

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2006)4STR462

Matched in: Parties Cce Vs. Camera World

Mazda Camera Centre Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)(117)ELT773Tri(Mum.)bai

of an order placed by it opened a letter credit on 16-7-1992 for import of parts of photographic camera. Prior to 30-6-1992 import of such parts was under Open General Licence (OGL).By notification issued on 30-6-1992 the

Universal Camera Corp. Vs. Labor Board

Court: US Supreme Court

Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Board - 340 U.S. 474 (1951) U.S. Supreme Court Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Board,

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. Ace Camera Equipment Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1984)43CTR(Bom)2; [1984]150ITR231(Bom); [1985]23TAXMAN457(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. Ace Camera Equipment Pvt. Ltd.