In Camera - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: in camera Page 1 of about 8 results (0.012 seconds)Ace Camera Equipment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1983)36CTR(Bom)385; [1984]150ITR227(Bom); [1983]15TAXMAN223(Bom)
dies were utilised by the assessee in the manufacture of cameras during the previous year. Having regard to this finding, the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUniversal Camera Corp. Vs. Labor Board
Court: US Supreme Court
Board - 340 U.S. 474 (1951) U.S. Supreme Court Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Board, 340 U.S. 474 (1951) Universal Camera
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCamera House, Bombay Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1969Bom437; [1970]25STC354(Bom)
any nature, everything being regulated by mechanical gadgets in the camera itself, or by other scientific precision processes. In support of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMazda Camera Centre Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (2000)(117)ELT773Tri(Mum.)bai
letter credit on 16-7-1992 for import of parts of photographic camera. Prior to 30-6-1992 import of such parts was under Open
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentral Camera Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. the Government of Madras
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [1971]27STC112(Mad)
Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. The assessee, Messrs Central Camera Company (Private) Limited, dealers in photographic materials at No. 35/4
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentral Camera Company Limited Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 1981(8)ELT344(Bom)
Rage, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order of Deshmukh J. (as he then was) dismissing the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce Vs. Camera World
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Reported in: (2006)4STR462
2. Heard Shri J.R. Madhium, Ld. JDR for the Appellants-Revenue and None for the Respondent.3. Shri Madhium submits that the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. Ace Camera Equipment Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1984)43CTR(Bom)2; [1984]150ITR231(Bom); [1985]23TAXMAN457(Bom)
Desai, J.1. This review application has been placed for admission. It deserves to be rejected on a two-fold basis. In...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>