Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Improvise - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 22 2012

Sayed DaraIn Ahsan Vs. State of West Bengal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-22-2012

the Forensic Science Laboratory which clearly revealed that the two bullets (Ext.B & I) were fired through an improvised fire arm, one hit the deceased in the occipital region and the other grazed the deceased in the


Sep 26 2002

Bachhitar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-26-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC3473; 2003(1)Crimes144(SC); [2002(3)JCR178(SC)]; JT2002(7)SC413; 2002(7)SCALE59; (2002)8SCC125; [2002]SUPP2SCR621

the naturalness and truthfulness of the testimony of PW-3. Ordinarily, interested witnesses tend to introduce coloured version and improvised statements to secure doubly sure conviction of the accused. This is not so in the present case.12. Human


Feb 11 1997

Jonas Woodhead and Sons (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-11-1997

Reported in: AIR1997SC1105; (1997)138CTR(SC)275; [1997]224ITR342(SC); JT1997(2)SC485; 1997(2)SCALE67; (1997)10SCC119

know-how which was for the betterment of the product in question which was already being produced; whether the improvisation made, is the part and parcel of the existing business or a new business was set up with


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 28 1973

Laxminarayan and anr. Vs. Returning Officer and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-28-1973

Reported in: AIR1974SC66; (1974)3SCC425; [1974]1SCR822

in the meeting.50. Marot Rao, being an appellant, is an interested witness. The dais in the meeting was improvised on a truck which had been used in the procession taken out before the meeting. But he did


Apr 25 1980

Rajamallaiah and anr. Vs. Anil Kishore and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-25-1980

Reported in: AIR1980SC1502; 1980Supp(1)SCC81; [1980]3SCR794; 1980(12)LC583(SC)

of grounds. What is involved is the protection of revenue and what is to be prevented is adhoc improvisation which jeopardises the revenue. That a particular improvisation yielded better results may be the exception which proves the


Mar 03 1981

Mohammad Usman Mohammad HussaIn Maniyar and ors. Vs. State of Maharash ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-03-1981

Reported in: AIR1981SC1062; 1981CriLJ588; 1981(1)SCALE445; (1981)2SCC443; 1981(Supp)SCC17; [1981]3SCR68

detonatOrs.(5) 251 caps like contrivances containing prohibited mixture of red arsenic sulphide and chlorate used to act as improvised percussions caps.(6) 104 kg. and 500 g. of potassium chlorate.(7) 37.5 kg. of special gelatines.(8) 300 kg. of


Sep 11 1978

Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-11-1978

Reported in: AIR1979SC262; [1978(37)FLR265]; 1979LabIC129; (1978)IILLJ412SC; (1979)2SCC88; [1979]1SCR590

persuade parties to concur and make binding order. This requires legislative backing. So Section 3. But such an improvised solution may leave one or the other or even both dis-satisfied with regard to ultimate rights. While enforcing


Jan 29 2009

Educomp Solutions Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-29-2009

Reported in: AIR2009Jhar132; [2009(2)JCR404(Jhr)]

valuation was not in consonance with the object of computer aided education in schools, and therefore, it needs improvisation of many aspects like monitoring and supervision with school information system. The aforesaid decision was taken in a


Apr 12 2001

Daga Chemicals Vs. State and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-12-2001

Reported in: 2001(3)WLC549; 2007(2)WLN672

in accordance with the provisions of the Scheme but they have not been provided with the authority of improvising on the conditions of the Scheme spelt out in the Notification. It must be remembered that most of


May 23 2007

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Usha Iron and Ferro Metal Corporation L ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-23-2007

Reported in: 141(2007)DLT161; [2008]296ITR140(Delhi)

incurred for the expansion/extension or for the betterment of the product which was already being produced, and/or the improvisation made is part and parcel of the existing business, it is allowable as a revenue expenditure.9. Following the


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial