Impression - Judgment Search Results

impression Prints Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-1

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC3980; 2005(102)ECC1; 2005(187)ELT170(SC); JT2005(7)SC585; (2005)7SCC497

It must be mentioned that in the beginning we were impressed by Mr. Bagaria's submissions. However we find that the authorities

DolphIn Impressions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT123Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This appeal is against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Mumbai, who in the impugned order upheld the order...

M/S. Impression Prints Vs. Cce, New Delhi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

application No.E/Stay/1708/2000 NB in Appeal No.E/2968/2000 NB filed by M/s. Impression Prints, the Tribunal had directed the appellants to pre-deposit a

Commnr. of Central Excise, Kolkatta-i Vs. Web Impression India Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Eastern...

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Impress Ad-aids and Displays

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2004)(173)ELT137Tri(Bang.)

1. By this appeal Revenue is challenging the correctness of the Order-in-Appeal No. 496/2000-C.E., dated 6-9-2000 by which the Commissioner...

The Commissioner of Central Vs. Impressive Computer Systems Pvt.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(180)ELT104Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This appeal is filed by the revenue against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The dispute relates to...

S.B.P. Anand Mohan Vs. Graphic Impressions (Madras)

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2004)120CompCas265

cent of the issued and paid-up capital in M/s. Graphic Impressions (Madras) Limited ('the Company') has filed this petition under Section

Kp Permanent Make-up, Inc. Vs. Lasting Impression I, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc. - 03-409 (2004) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2004 KP

In the Matter of Multi Impression Carbons Private Ltd(vol. Liqn.) Vs.. ...

Court: Delhi

Decision:01. 02.2019 + CO.PET. 4/2019 IN THE MATTER OF MULTI IMPRESSION CARBONS PRIVATE LTD(VOL. LIQN.) ....... Petitioner Through Mr. Deepak Anand,

M/s. Add Print (India) Enterprises Private Limited by its Manager, Ker ...

Court: Chennai

is a unique product with modern quality, which gives 30000 impressions of the stamp. The sales turn over was increased from