Importer - Judgment Search Results

Universal Imports Agency and anr. Vs. the Chief Controller of Imports ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1961SC41; [1961]1SCR305

of Affairs, Economiques, endorsed 'authorise' on theapplication submitted by the importers' banker in respect of such transactions,but the Government did not

French India Importing Corporation, Delhi Vs. the Chief Controller of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1961SC1752; 1983LC2169D(SC); [1962]2SCR410

counsel urged, exhaust the entirety of the rights of the importer. The previous French law authorized the import into a territory

Agya Import Limited vs.joint Commissioner of Customs (Siib-Import),icd ...

Court: Delhi

till 23rd June, 2016 i.e. nearly four months after the import.5. One of the directors of the petitioner, as per the

Didwania Import and Export (P) Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1988)(38)ELT531Tri(Mum.)bai

of objection was that at the time of shipment the importers did not have licences and there was no evidence that

Bacchus Imports, Ltd. Vs. Dias

Court: US Supreme Court

protecting the public health, safety or morals, and that the importer's license fee was not imposed to that end. Surely the

Glass Chatons Importers and Users' Association Vs. Union of India (UOi ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1961SC1514; [1962]1SCR862

applicant is an Association of merchants, some of whom were importers and some the actual users of glass chatons. Import of

Aarkeyess Imports Corporation Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1988)(17)LC52Tri(Delhi)

manufacturer.8. The appellants had contracted for the purchase of the imported goods during May-June, 1986. A general plea made by them

General Import Company (India) Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1989)(20)LC112Tri(Mum.)bai

for stock and sale. In their letter dated 12-12-1983 the importers have stated : "As regards the Customs depts contention that

C.C. (import) Vs. Titex India Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(101)ECC10

only. In the reply of questionnaire dated 14.8.2000 by the importer, they themselves have declared at Point No. VI that they

Neelam Imports Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court: Delhi

for sale to the consumer, in which case, if an importer, who enjoys the facility of I.E. Code imports certain goods