Important Looking - Judgment Search Results

French India Importing Corporation, Delhi Vs. the Chief Controller of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1961SC1752; 1983LC2169D(SC); [1962]2SCR410

..... to levy such customs duties as were fixed under law for the several articles imported the import itself should be treated as authorised by the previous law whose operation was continued ..... 1954 extracted earlier in the circumstances it looks somewhat curious that the petitioners now before us who as interveners in the petitions by the universal imports agency etc supported the invoking of para .....

Universal Imports Agency and anr. Vs. the Chief Controller of Imports ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1961SC41; [1961]1SCR305

by way of abundant caution applied to the chiefcontroller of imports exports for licences for clearance of goods butthey were all

Agya Import Limited vs.joint Commissioner of Customs (Siib-Import),icd ...

Court: Delhi

23rd june 2016 i e nearly four months after the import 5 one of the directors of the petitioner as per

Pushpanjali Silk Private Limited Represented by Its Director, Sanjiv K ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2006)4MLJ968

prior to shipment of the subject goods however higher contemporaneous import values were noticed in nidb data in respect of goods

The Manager, Central Warehousing Corporation Vs. Rita Enterprises, Rep ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2007(122)ECC321; 2007(148)LC321(Madras); 2008(221)ELT28(Mad)

non compliance thereof section 48 of customs act 1962 petitioner imported 20 000 pieces of glass shell with fluorescent powder welding

Narendra Mafatlal Mehta, Vs. Union of India (Uoi),

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(3)BomCR302

under para 186 1 so asto avail the flexibility of import replenishmentpermissible under am 91 policy 9 para 186 1 read

Pushpanjali Silks Private Limited, Rep. by Its Director, Sanjiv Kumar ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2006(200)ELT204(Mad)

cannot be too vehemently emphasised that it is of utmost importance that in disposing of the quasi judicial issues before them

S.N. Puri S/O L. Shadiram and ors. Vs. N. Banerjee,

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1997(1)BomCR39

his arguments he has cited several authorities 6 the most important question that requires to be considered by me is does

Pushpanjali Silk Private Limited Rep. by Its Director Sanjiv Kumar Jhu ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2006(203)ELT21(Mad)

the appeal filed by the petitioner holding that the goods imported under contract dated 17 2 2005 were required to be

Jamnadas Madhavji and Co. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi),

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(3)BomCR798; 2004(164)ELT8(Bom)

india the saidincentives are in the form of grant of importlicence ccs duty drawback etc as far as theexport of spices