Implemental - Judgment Search Results
Central India Builders Vs. the Food Corporation of India Project Imple ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-03-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALLMR561; 2003(3)ARBLR586(Bom); 2003(6)BomCR264
F.I. Rebello, J. 1. Both the petitioners are being disposed of by common order. Arbitration Petition No. 191 of 2000...
Natrip Implementation Society Vs. IVRCL Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
Vibhu Bakhru, J. 1. The appellant (hereafter NATRIP ) has filed the present appeal underSection 37(2) of the Arbitration and...
Mahesh Agriculture Implements and Forgings Ltd. Vs. Member, Industrial ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-04-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ALLMR809; 2005(2)BomCR625
in favour of the petitioner, thereby the effect, operation and implementation of the impugned orders passed by the Industrial Court and
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
The Agricultural Implements Dealers Syndicate Vs. the Commissioner of ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-03-1970
Reported in: [1971]27STC227(MP)
was exempt from tax as kutti machine was an agricultural implement. This view was at first accepted by the Board of
Bharat Agri. Implements and Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur-ii
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-14-2002
Reported in: (2002)LC53Tri(Delhi)
issue involved in this appeal, filed by M/s. Bharat Agriculture Implements & Re-rolling Mills, is whether the benefit of Notification No.
Shivagrico Implements Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2004
Reported in: (2005)(179)ELT573TriDel
1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned order-in-appeal vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has enhanced the penalty under...
Kumaran Implements Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Feb-22-2005
Reported in: (2005)(186)ELT223Tri(Bang.)
Rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules against M/s. Kumaran Implements by holding that they were the real manufacturers of agricultural
Shivagrico Implements Limited Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2005
came to know about the change of date of the implementation of the scheme of payment duty based on Annual Capacity
Bharat Agriculture Implements Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-1992
Reported in: (1992)(42)LC518Tri(Delhi)
1. The present miscellaneous application emerges from stay order No.E/307/91-B1 dated 8th October, 1991. Shri V. Sridharan, the learned advocate...
Karnataka Implements and Vs. C.C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Mar-30-1998
Reported in: (1998)(102)ELT611Tri(Chennai)
1. Heard both the sides. In these 3 appeals, the issue involved is about chargeability of duty in respect of...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free