Implement - Judgment Search Results

Karnataka Implements and Vs. Collr. of Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)(41)ELT572TriDel

1 the appellants stated that the parts imported by them were meant for a special type of trailer which had...

Phoolson Foundry Works Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)(42)ELT654TriDel

..... that centrifugal water pumps used for pumping water from the well are not agricultural implements accordingly implements means the apparatus or instruments employed in agriculture in 1965 16 stc 860 aggarwal ..... of the allahabad high court under the sales tax act interpreting the words agricultural implements will not have any relevancy for the purpose of interpreting notifications issued under the .....

United States Vs. Paradise

Court: US Supreme Court

..... moreover the requirement is temporary its term being contingent upon the department s successful implementation of valid promotional procedures it was in fact suspended upon the timely submission ..... elevated in rank as long as qualified black candidates were available until the department implemented an acceptable promotion procedure the united states challenges the constitutionality of this order .....

Arvind Laxmanrao Kinge Vs. State of Maharashtra, Urban Development Pub ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1988(1)BomCR280; 1988MhLJ575

..... some time was required for making the necessary preparations for implementing the said judgment by its judgment therefore in the above ..... that there were difficulties experienced by the various states in implementing the judgment of supreme court in dr pradeep jain s ..... view be considered or appreciated from another angle since the implementation of the judgment of the supreme court in dr pradeep .....

P.D. Gurunadha Prasad Vs. Deputy Director of Mines and Geology and ors ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1988CriLJ1543

..... director 1st respondent directed the 2nd respondent asst director to implement the interim directions issued by the court and submit ..... a parawise remarks the government also directed the respondents to implement the orders of this court immediately therefore i do not ..... the respondents waggery will prevail the petitioner is seeking to implement the direction issued by the first respondent the first .....

Dr. Dinesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Motilal Nehru Medical College, Allahabad ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC2396; JT1987(3)SC228; 1987(2)SCALE169; (1987)4SCC122; [1987]3SCR744

..... fond hope that the scheme evolved by this court could be implemented in the educational session to follow this court had not then ..... assessed what magnitude the task of implementation of the scheme would involve nbsp 3 when the scheme did ..... to the switch over as contemplated by the scheme and therefore implementation of the scheme under the main judgment should be deferred at .....

Brock Vs. Roadway Express, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the relevant supporting evidence if the employer is not provided this information the procedures implementing 405 contain an unacceptable risk of erroneous decisions the secretary represents that it is ..... s new regulations we accept the representation as embodying an established official procedure for implementing 405 of which employers are specifically made aware it is undisputed however that in .....

Yashbir Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC662a; JT1987(3)SC399; (1988)ILLJ12SC; 1987(2)SCALE371; (1987)4SCC345; [1987]3SCR1018; 1987(3)SLJ231(SC); 1987(2)LC625(SC)

..... the court and the interim orders issued by the court restraining the railway authorities from implementing the circular dated october 27 1965 during the pendency of the writ petition paragraph 2 ..... granting promotion with effect from april i 1966 as initially reorganisation was proposed to be implemented with effect from that date as is clear from railway board s notification dated october .....

A. Viswanathan Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Pondicherry and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC731; JT1987(1)SC369; 1987(1)SCALE249; (1987)2SCC63; [1987]2SCR179; 1987(1)LC621(SC)

..... tribes is concerned the provisions of the motor vehicles amendment act 1978 can be implemented straightway the implementation of this provision need not wait for the framing of any rules since ..... scheduled tribes in respect of stage carriage permits public carrier permits and national permits implemented without further delay 2 the state govts union territory administrations are also requested to .....

Cal. Coastal Comm'n Vs. Granite Rock Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... granite rock s mining activity would be preempted whether or not the regulation was implemented through a permit requirement conversely if reasonable state environmental regulation is not preempted ..... to develop coastal zone management programs additionally it authorizes grants to help coastal states implement these management programs once approved and states would be aided in the acquisition and .....