Skip to content


Implement - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: implement Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 403 results (0.039 seconds)
Nov 04 2004 (HC)

Mahesh Agriculture Implements and Forgings Ltd. Vs. Member, Industrial ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-04-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR809; 2005(2)BomCR625

..... and granted an interim stay in favour of the petitioner thereby the effect operation and implementation of the impugned orders passed by the industrial court and the labour court has been ..... april 1992 this writ petition has been admitted and interim stay of operation effect and implementation of the order dated 26 9 1991 passed by labour court has been granted it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 20 2004 (TRI)

Shivagrico Implements Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-20-2004

Reported in : (2005)(179)ELT573TriDel

1 this appeal has been preferred against the impugned order in appeal vide which the commissioner appeals has enhanced the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 2004 (HC)

Ranga Reddy District Sarpanches' Association and Ors. Vs. Government o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-29-2004

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD1; 2004(1)ALT659

..... choices prioritizing developmental areas executing the policy initiating the budget or even in implementing the local works in substantial and critical areas of predominantly local interests and ..... as an instrument of constitutional guidance for making laws devolving powers and responsibilities regarding implementation of schemes for economic development and social justice which may be entrusted to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 29 2004 (TRI)

Cellular Operators Association Vs. Department of

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Mar-29-2004

..... not challenged the interconnection regulations which regulations are statutory and which prescribed the date of implementation of retention of 5 passed through revenue by cellular operators as 31 1 2001 ..... and pragmatic interpretation to the interconnection regulations when schedule ii talks of date of implementation by 31st january 2002 that could at best mean where the passed through revenue .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 14 2004 (FN)

Norton Vs. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-14-2004

..... s c 251 d 1 which required the federal communications commission to establish regulations to implement interconnection requirements w ithin 6 months of the date of enactment of the telecommunications act ..... the regulation defining a land use plan declares that a plan is not a final implementation decision on actions which require further specific plans process steps or decisions under specific .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 07 2004 (FN)

Department of Transportation Vs. Public Citizen

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-07-2004

..... carrier for authority to operate in the interior of the united states until fmcsa implemented specific application and safety monitoring requirements for mexican carriers some of these requirements ..... any funds to process or review any applications by mexican motor carriers until fmcsa implemented a variety of specific application and safety monitoring requirements for mexican carriers this .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 17 2004 (HC)

Vedire Venkata Reddy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-17-2004

Reported in : AIR2005AP155; 2005(1)ALD325

..... it will be totally impermissible for the state of andhra pradesh to proceed ahead in implementing the project without getting appropriate clearance as is envisaged under the environment protection act ..... view of what has been discussed above holding that action of the state government in implementation of the project without obtaining environmental clearance as envisaged under the provisions of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 13 2004 (HC)

Urban Development Authority Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-13-2004

..... necessary only with a view to overcome the difficulty arising from the period stipulated for implementation of the scheme under section 27 in the circumstances therefore the period stipulated by ..... section 27 for substantial implementation of the scheme must necessarily be counted from the date the final declaration under .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2004 (FN)

Frew Vs. Hawkins

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-23-2004

..... welfare rights org v shapp 602 f 2d 1114 ca3 1979 modifying consent decree implementing pennsylvania s epsdt program in light of changed circumstances rufo rejected the idea that the ..... the concerns they express are legitimate ones if not limited to reasonable and necessary implementations of federal law remedies outlined in consent decrees involving state officeholders may improperly deprive future .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 21 2004 (HC)

Ramkrishna Mission Vivekananda Centenary College and ors. Vs. Dr. Sant ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-21-2004

Reported in : (2005)1CALLT176(HC),2005(2)CHN371

..... envisaged in article 30 1 the college authority is legally bound to implement the provisions of the act of 1975 and the act of ..... there is no defence available to the college authority to refuse implementation of the provisions of the act of 1975 and the act ..... 1979 and hence there cannot be any objection from any corner regarding implementation of those acts and statute in the case of this college .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //