Imp - Judgment Search Results
In Re: Imp Powers Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-29-2007
Reported in: IV(2008)BC183; 2007(4)BomCR761; [2008]142CompCas481(Bom)
petitioners and appointed a monitoring committee in order to sort out the outstanding issues and for monitoring the implementation of the reconstruction package.3. In pursuance of the orders passed by this court, a meeting was convened of
Universal Imp (U.S.S.R.) Electrical Limited, Satna and ors. Vs. Shiv B ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-22-1996
Reported in: AIR1997MP115
amended by Central Amending Act 104 of 1976. As there is no exclusion of the jurisdiction expressly or impliedly by Act No. 4 of 1994 to exercise revisional jurisdiction by the High Court under Section 115 against
imp Power Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-23-2003
disposal of the appeal. This appears reasonable. I, therefore, waive deposit of the credit demanded and the penalty imposed of Rs. 10,000/- subject to compliance with this condition being shown on 24.11.2003.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
imp Power Ltd. and Manoj Kumar Sen Vs. Commissioner of Customs and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-22-2004
waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty and stay recovery thereof along With the appeals are filed by IMP Power Ltd. and its Assistant manager against the order of Commissioner of Central Excise Vapi.2. After hearing the
imp Power Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-02-2004
of inter-alia, Electrical Transformers. During the year 1994-95 pursuant to export orders received they obtained various Value Bond Import Licences, imported the goods and effected Exports.1.2 For the manufacture of the goods exported the main puts were
Cc (imp) Vs. Mountmine Impex Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-04-2007
Reported in: (2007)(118)ECC407
stay, we proceed to decide the appeal itself.2. The facts of the case are that the respondents have imported a consignment of 'Steel Shots' and classified the same under Chapter Heading 73259920, as articles of alloy of
imp Power Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-18-2006
Reported in: (2007)107TTJ(Mum.)522
essentially confirms the view that requirement of deduction at source under Section 195 would arise only if the impugned payment to the non-resident is chargeable to tax in India. In this view of matter, we consider no
imp Power Ltd. Vs. Ito
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-18-2006
essentially confirms the view that requirement of deduction at source under Section 195 would arise only if the impugned payment to the Non-resident is chargeable to tax in India. In this view of matter, we consider no
United Gas Imp Co. Vs. Callery Properties, Inc
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1965
UNITED GAS IMP CO. v. CALLERY PROPERTIES, INC - 380 U.S. 931 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court UNITED GAS IMP CO. v.
Bellingham Bay Imp Co Vs. City of New Whatcom
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1899
BELLINGHAM BAY IMP CO v. CITY OF NEW WHATCOM - 172 U.S. 320 (1899) U.S. Supreme Court BELLINGHAM BAY IMP CO
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free