Immateriality - Judgment Search Results
India Umbrella Manufacturing Co. and ors. Vs. Bhagabandei Agarwalla (D ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-05-2004
Reported in: AIR2004SC1321; 2004(2)ALD12(SC); 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)382; (2004)3CALLT1(SC); (SCSuppl)2004(2)CHN96; 2004(1)CTC353; JT2004(1)SC200; (2004)137PLR251; 2004(1)SCALE53; (2004)3SCC17; MANU/SC/0002/2004
not interested in securing eviction of the other tenant is in the facts and circumstances of the case immaterial and irrelevant.9. In order to cut short further litigation we are inclined to invoke the jurisdiction vesting in
V.N. Ratheesh Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-06-2006
Reported in: AIR2006SC2667; 2006CriLJ3634; JT2006(6)SC163; 2006(3)KLT383(SC); RLW2006(4)SC3168; 2006(6)SCALE553; (2006)10SCC617
hold that the discrepancies as pointed out by the trial Court were trivial and so called discrepancies were immaterial and insufficient to disbelieve them. Unfortunately the High Court did not analyse the evidence and in a very
Bhag Mal (Alias) Ram Bux and ors. Vs. Munshi (Dead) by Lrs. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-17-2007
Reported in: JT2007(4)SC514; (2008)1MLJ1095(SC); 2007(4)SCALE603
He rejected the application to set aside the abatement. Whether the order made was right or wrong is immaterial, there was no appeal against it and it was in the circumstances clearly final. Their Lordships think that
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras Vs. Ponni Sugars and Chemicals Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-16-2008
Reported in: [2008]306ITR392(SC); 2008(12)SCALE570; 2008(9)SCC337
purpose test. The point of time at which the subsidy is paid is not relevant. The source is immaterial. The form of subsidy is immaterial. The main eligibility condition in the scheme with which we are concerned
Raju @ Raj Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-03-2007
Reported in: JT2007(6)SC404; 2007(6)SCALE499; (2007)10SCC289
I.P.C., must in the circumstances be held to mean that he was acquitted of that charge. It is immaterial whether this omission was due to oversight or any other reason. Once there is, thus, an acquittal of
Jitendra Kumar Singh and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-08-2010
Reported in: 2010(1)SCALE358; (2010)3SCC119; [2010] 1 SCR 325
category, that is, he shall be deemed to have been adjusted against the unreserved vacancies. It shall be immaterial that he has availed any facility or relaxation (like relaxation in age limit) available to reserved category.52. From
State of Karnataka Vs. Bantara Sudhakara @ Sudha and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-18-2008
Reported in: 2008(10)SCALE70; (2008)11SCC38
was less than 16 years. Therefore the trial Court held that the question of consent was irrelevant and immaterial. In appeal, the High Court held that the age was more than 16 years and there was consent
S.L. Construction and anr. Vs. Alapati Srinivasa Rao and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-23-2008
Reported in: AIR2009SC1538; 2009(2)MhLJ971(SC); 2009(1)MPHT465; 2008(15)SCALE308; (2009)1SCC500:2009AIRSCW1044
the cheque within the afore-mentioned period and not the number of times it is presented. It is, therefore, immaterial whether for one reason or the other the complainant had to present the cheque for the third time
indu Shekhar Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-28-2006
Reported in: AIR2006SC2432; 2006(4)ALD66(SC); 2006(3)AWC2187(SC); JT2006(5)SC260; (2006)4MLJ135(SC); 2006(5)SCALE107; (2006)8SCC129
opined that there was not much difference between deputation and transfer.A difference between transfer and deputation would be immaterial where an appointment by transfer is permissible, particularly in an organization like CBI where personnel are drawn from
Maniben W/O Danabhai Tulshibai Maheria Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-11-2007
Reported in: 2007CriLJ3187; I(2007)DMC801SC; [2007(3)JCR140(SC)]; 2007(2)KLT965(SC); 2007(7)SCALE93; (2007)10SCC362; 2007AIRSCW3501; AIR2007SC1932; JT2007(7)SC551.
of Mr. Raichura that the 'degree of burn' was not disclosed by Dr. Ashish is, in our opinion, immaterial.16. In 'The Order of Things' by Mr. Barbara Ann Kipfer, classification in regard to the burn injuries has
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free