Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Id - Judgment Search Results

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 02 2014

Idli Yerriswamy Vs. Cbi/Acb

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-02-2014

Bakhamarkandeswara Minerals and Sri. Manjunatheswar Minerals. He has further stated that during the period 2007 to 2010 Sri. Idly Yerriswamy, the partner and associate of Sri. Kenche Mahesh @ Karpudi Mahesh had requested him to print and


Oct 14 2022

M/S. ID Incorporated vs Commercial Tax Inspector

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-14-2022

FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 22ND ASWINA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 35207 OF 2011 PETITIONER/S: M/S. ID INCORPORATED BOSE ROAD, VYTILA, COCHIN-682019,REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SHRI.ABHAYAKUMAR N.S.BY ADV SRI.BEJOY CHERIYAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 COMMERCIAL TAX


Nov 05 2024

M/S. Ids Next Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd., vs Regional Provident Fund ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-05-2024

NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 13726 OF 2023 (L-PF) BETWEEN: M/S. IDS NEXT BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INTELLECT DATA SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED), A COMPANY REGISTERED


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 13 2002

id-mohd. Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2002

Reported in: 2002IVAD(Delhi)100; 2002CriLJ4171; 97(2002)DLT776; 2002(62)DRJ338

the three were not coming to the factory from 18-11-97 onwards. Mohd. Islam had been arrested at the identification of Master Abdul Sattar. A disclosure statement purported to have been made regarding the alleged participation of the


Sep 05 2013

M/S Ids Infotech Limited Mohali Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-05-2013

COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.16378 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 05, 2013 M/s IDS Infotech Limited, Mohali ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE


Jun 30 2014

Present:- Mr. Id Singla Advocate Vs. Joint Secretary and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jun-30-2014

C.W.P.No.18466 of 2006 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.18466 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: 30.6.2014 Aster Beg ..........Petitioner Versus Joint Secretary and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:-...


Apr 24 1995

intazamiya Committee Id Gah, Morar Vs. M.P. Wakf Board, Bhopal

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-24-1995

Reported in: AIR1996MP47; 1996(0)MPLJ37

of the plaintiff and removing him from the post of Adhyakshya. It was alleged that there was an Id Gah at Thandi Sadak, Morar which was known as Morar Id Gah. It was registered under the M.


Jan 20 2005

Tata Sons Limited and anr. Vs. Fashion Id Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-20-2005

Reported in: 117(2005)DLT748; (2005)140PLR12; 2005(30)PTC182(Del)

with goods or services using the Plaintiffs' trademarks TATA/TATA INFOTECH/TATA INFOTECH EDUCATION or many other mark/name which is identical with or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs' trademarks TATA/TATA INFOTECH, whether as a domain name or otherwise and


Apr 03 1979

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Id Mohammed Nizamuddin

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-03-1979

Reported in: (1979)10CTR(Raj)136; [1979]120ITR660(Raj)

C.M. Lodha, C.J. 1. These are three connected matters which can be conveniently disposed of by a common order. Case No. 64 of 1973 pertains to the assessment year 1963-64, in respect of penal interest for...


Jul 27 2005

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Id. Mohd. Nizamuddin

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Decided on: Jul-27-2005

Reported in: (2005)97TTJ(JP.)142

1. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the learned CIT(A), dt. 6th March, 2000 for the asst. yr. 1996-97. In this appeal, the Revenue is aggrieved on the ground that...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial