Ice - Judgment Search Results

Oregon Vs. Ice

Court: US Supreme Court

Oregon v. Ice - 07-901 (2009) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2008 OREGON V. ICE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OREGON v

Chanda Softy Ice Cream a partnership concern rep. by Its Partner, Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: LC2007(1)11; (2006)4MLJ1769; 2006(33)PTC703(Mad)

suit are the respondents in the present appeals.The respondents herein namely, 'MARS' Incorporated and Milky Way 'Galaxy' of ice creams had filed a Civil Suit in C.S. No. 718 of 1999 under the Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction

M/s Ice Tv Private Limited Vs. M/s Sreedevi Digital Systems Private Li ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CURATIVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.76 OF2021IN REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO.980 OF2020IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.1637 OF2020M/s. ICE TV PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner VERSUS M/s. SREEDEVI DIGITAL SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Respondents ORDER Application seeking oral

The Ice and General Mills Vs. the Income Tax Officer, Central Circle I ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1979)13CTR(SC)420; [1980]121ITR547(SC); (1980)1SCC346; [1980]2SCR236; 1980(12)LC89(SC)

to dispose of the appeal by a short Judgment.2. The appellant, a firm, carries on business of manufacturing ice and preservation of potatoes in its cold storage. It was assessed to income-tax for the assessment year 1961-62

Prag Ice and Oil Mills and anr. Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1296; 1978CriLJ1281a; (1978)3SCC459; [1978]3SCR293

ORDERNew Delhi, the 30th September, 1977. S. O. WHEREAS the Central Government is of opinion that it is necessary and expedient so to do for securing equitable distribution and availability at fair prices, of mustard oil;...

Lakshmi Ice Factory Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)4SCC171; 1971(III)LC465(SC)

judgment and order of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir staying a suit filed by the Lakshmi Ice Factory for a declaration that the Union of India was not entitled to recover Rs. 35,210-21 from the

Banaras Ice Factory Limited Vs. Its Workmen

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1957SC168; (1957)ILLJ253SC; [1957]1SCR143

Labour Appellate Tribunal of India at Allahabad dated October 30, 1952. The relevant facts are these. The Banaras Ice Factory Limited, the appellant before us, was incorporated on September 13, 1949, as a private limited company and

Sushil Ice Factory& Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. Vs.govt of Nct of ...

Court: Delhi

NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2480/2017 & CM No.10712/2017 (direction) Judgment delivered on:21. 04.2017 ........ Petitioners versus SUSHIL ICE FACTORY& COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD. AND ANR. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS Advocates who appeared in

South Shore Ice Creams Pvt. Ltd., vs the Revenue Divisional Officer,

Court: Kerala

THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 24620 OF 2024 PETITIONER: SOUTH SHORE ICE CREAMS PVT. LTD., KADVANTHRA,REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DR. RAHUL ANTONY SIMON, PIN - 682020 BY ADV C.K.SHERIN RESPONDENTS:

South Shore Ice Creams Pvt Ltd. vs the Thasildhar. (L.R)

Court: Kerala

THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 22334 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: SOUTH SHORE ICE CREAMS PVT LTD. KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682020 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY AND MANAGER, BY ADVS. P.A.AJITH