I E - Judgment Search Results

1. E.K Susil Kumar vs 1. E.K Sheeba

Court: Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 CRL.MC NO.

Rajesh I.E.@ Shvianna vs State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

S Location: THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNSS) HIGH COURT OF PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.313/2021 KARNATAKA AND S.C NO.603/2022 FOR ALLEGED O/P/U/S 302 IPC, REGISTERED BY THE

“The Complainant I.E. Gurmukh Son of Balwant Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

and is duly identified by ASI Dheer Singh. The complainant suffered a statement that a compromise has been effected with the accused i.e.the present petitioneRs.In the light of such factual position, I am of the considered view

i.E. Vittal and anr. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1996(3)ALT707; (1997)137CTR(AP)396; [1996]221ITR760(AP)

the revenue to disregard the sale of the said property on the ground that it relates to small extent of land. It is well-settled that consideration for sale of small extents of lands is always more than

S.i.E.L. Ltd., Titawi, Muzaffarnagar Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1998(1)AWC298

short the Act).3. It appears that the Cane Commissioner. U. P.. Lucknow vide his order dated 9.11.96 in exercise of power under Section 15 of the Sugarcane Act reserved area including purchase centres, i.e., Bhora Kalan, Hadauti,

M.i.E and R and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

The petitioner-Institute is a Company registered under Section 25 of the Company Act, 1956. The petitioner is an educational institution and claims to be engaged in providing education to the students, in research and training in the

i.E.L. Employees Union Vs. Indian Explosives Limited

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1983)IILLJ100All

ORDERV.K. Mehrotra, J.1. These two petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution are by workmen of M/s. Indian Explosives Limited, Kanpur and M/s. Camphor and Allied Products Ltd., Bareilly which are companies registered under the Companies Act.

i.E.L. Ltd. (Successor-in-interest to Crescent Dyes Chemicals Ltd.) Vs ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1993)112CTR(Cal)144,[1993]204ITR386(Cal)

facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that reimbursements of medical expenses and house rent allowance paid in cash were to be taken as part of salary for purposes of

B.i.E. Engineering (P) Ltd. Vs. the Calcutta Municipal Corporation

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1993)2CALLT150(HC)

permission the petitioner had made reconstruction work but the corporation authorities demolished the major portion of building by exercising the power given Under Section 400(8) of the Municipal Corporation Act of 1980 and the acts done and/or

i.E.L. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1988)(15)ECC299

1. This is an appeal against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay.2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants manufactured .products falling under Tariff Item 15AA