Husband - Judgment Search Results
The Respondent-husband Has Filed a Petition Under Section 25 of the Vs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-02-2013
TA No.53 of 2013(O&M) #1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. TA No.53 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision:-02.05.2013 Avtar Kaur......Petitioner. Versus Gian Singh......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.T.S.Chauhan, Advocate for...
“petitioner-husband Is Praying for Grant of Anticipatory Bail in Cas ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
CRM No.M-6 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-6 of 2014 Date of Decision:4. 4.2014 Mohit Kaila ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & Anr. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE...
X Wife Vs. Y - Husband
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-21-2016
answered first is as to whether the averments, accusations and character assassination of the wife by the appellant husband in the written statement constitutes mental cruelty for sustaining the claim for divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
A-Wife Vs. B-Husband
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-07-2016
Family Court No.2, Mumbai in Petition No.A-1371 of 2002. The said petition was preferred by the respondent - husband seeking decree of divorce under clauses (ia) and (ib) of Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Balvant Daso Batgiri and anr. Vs. Umabai Husband Shankarro Godbole and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-10-1920
Reported in: (1921)ILR45Bom812
Matched in: Parties Balvant Daso Batgiri and anr. Vs. Umabai Husband Shankarro Godbole and ors.
M/s. Chitralekha Builders & Anr. Through Anil G. Shah Power Of Att ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-01-2021
APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.946 OF2016M/S. CHITRALEKHA BUILDERS & ANR. THROUGH ANIL G. SHAH POWER OF ATTORNEY & HUSBAND OF THE PARTNER …APPELLANTS Versus G.I.C. EMPLOYEES SONAL VIHAR CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ANR. …RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT INDU
P.Leen vs Susheela (Died) Rep. by Her Husband Saji
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-14-2023
STATE:1. SUSHEELA (DIED), D/O. KUNJUKUTTY, CHARUVILA, PUTHEN VEEDU, SALEM JUNCTION,, PLACHERI MURI, VALAKODE VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY HER HUSBAND, SAJI M., RESIDING AT, SAME ADDRESS.2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OFKERLA, KOCHI-31 BY
Leela Jose Represented by Her Husband and Power of Attorney Holder Jos ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-13-2023
CYRIAC, PANAMKUZHAKKAL HOUSE, SRM ROAD, PIN -682018, THRIKKANARVATTOM DESOM, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY HER HUSBAND AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER JOSE SYRIAC, SON OF SON OF LATE JOSE KURIAN, AGED 64 YEARS, RESIDING
S. Sreelakshmi (Wife) Aged 34 Years, W/O. N.M. Sreekumar, Sreehari, T. ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-31-2023
order in M.C.No.201 of 2018 of the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram. RPFC No.257 of 2022 is filed by the husband (Sreekumar), aggrieved by the direction to pay monthly maintenance allowance of Rs.8,000/- to the child. RPFC No.12of 2023
Shri Dharma Bhika Patil (Since Deceased by His Heirs Smt. Indubai Dhar ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-07-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)BomCR561
judgment of the Delhi High Court, that the correct position must be that if a wife or a husband acquires a property and the other spouse if he or she is the tenant, has a legal right
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free