Husband - Judgment Search Results
Husband of the Victim vs the State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-16-2021
APRIL 2021 / 26TH CHAITHRA, 1943 Crl.MC.No.1087 OF 2021(E) CRIME NO.280/2015 OF Vandanmedu Police Station , Idukki PETITIONER/ACCUSED: HUSBAND OF THE VICTIM XXX XXX BY ADV. SRI.K.S.ARUNDAS RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANTS: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED
The Respondent-husband Has Filed a Petition Under Section 25 of the Vs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-02-2013
TA No.53 of 2013(O&M) #1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. TA No.53 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision:-02.05.2013 Avtar Kaur......Petitioner. Versus Gian Singh......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.T.S.Chauhan, Advocate for...
“petitioner-husband Is Praying for Grant of Anticipatory Bail in Cas ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
CRM No.M-6 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-6 of 2014 Date of Decision:4. 4.2014 Mohit Kaila ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & Anr. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
X Wife Vs. Y - Husband
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-21-2016
answered first is as to whether the averments, accusations and character assassination of the wife by the appellant husband in the written statement constitutes mental cruelty for sustaining the claim for divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the
A-Wife Vs. B-Husband
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-07-2016
Family Court No.2, Mumbai in Petition No.A-1371 of 2002. The said petition was preferred by the respondent - husband seeking decree of divorce under clauses (ia) and (ib) of Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Ramanna Since Dead by Legal Representatives vs Smt Neelavathamma (Husb ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1272 OF 2010 (INJ) BETWEEN: RAMANNA SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL...
Balvant Daso Batgiri and anr. Vs. Umabai Husband Shankarro Godbole and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-10-1920
Reported in: (1921)ILR45Bom812
Matched in: Parties Balvant Daso Batgiri and anr. Vs. Umabai Husband Shankarro Godbole and ors.
M/s. Chitralekha Builders & Anr. Through Anil G. Shah Power Of Att ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-01-2021
APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.946 OF2016M/S. CHITRALEKHA BUILDERS & ANR. THROUGH ANIL G. SHAH POWER OF ATTORNEY & HUSBAND OF THE PARTNER …APPELLANTS Versus G.I.C. EMPLOYEES SONAL VIHAR CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ANR. …RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT INDU
P.Leen vs Susheela (Died) Rep. by Her Husband Saji
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-14-2023
STATE:1. SUSHEELA (DIED), D/O. KUNJUKUTTY, CHARUVILA, PUTHEN VEEDU, SALEM JUNCTION,, PLACHERI MURI, VALAKODE VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY HER HUSBAND, SAJI M., RESIDING AT, SAME ADDRESS.2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OFKERLA, KOCHI-31 BY
Leela Jose Represented by Her Husband and Power of Attorney Holder Jos ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-13-2023
CYRIAC, PANAMKUZHAKKAL HOUSE, SRM ROAD, PIN -682018, THRIKKANARVATTOM DESOM, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY HER HUSBAND AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER JOSE SYRIAC, SON OF SON OF LATE JOSE KURIAN, AGED 64 YEARS, RESIDING
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free